<div dir="ltr">I'm not sure of the original intent behind "flexible-width", but from an end-user perspective, "responsive" would be far more useful/meaningful.<div><br></div><div style>+1 from me for adding it to the tag whitelist.</div>
<div style><br></div><div style>As for guidelines: we should probably set some minimum screen resolutions that should be supported, so that users know that Themes with the "responsive" tag would work well on given devices X, Y, and Z. The Theme would also need to pass *all* Theme Unit Tests for those minimum resolutions. (That will mostly impact image scaling and video embeds, as well as long site/post titles, and similar things designed to break layouts.)</div>
<div style><br></div><div style>Most everything beyond that should be left to design aesthetic, IMHO.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Bryan Hadaway <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bhadaway@gmail.com" target="_blank">bhadaway@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Doesn't <i>flexible-width</i> already cover this? Or you mean the actual design would need to change at different sizes to be considered <i>responsive</i>.<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
theme-reviewers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers" target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>