<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font face="Franklin Gothic Book">The solution I see it reviews to
be done more quickly. We are not evaluate diamonds, so it's not
necessary a theme to be shiny in all angles. Moreover theme
development is dynamic process, the authors can submit a new version
with improvements at any time.<br>
The accent in the review process has to be on the end-user - if a
theme works with the website content and doesn't do any troubles
to the user, let it pass. All other remarks are practice for
mastery :)<br>
<br>
Fingli<br>
<br>
</font>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 17.2.2013 19:05, Bryan Hadaway
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAP3jXhS5U8_AnJYtdqQi6b0tDON_pDWE8nT7ve_mv+a37Q0iUQ@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">I agree. However, please realize my thoughts follow a
generalized stream of thought on the overall issue, not any
specific case. I say what's done is done and leave it in the past,
but we could use more guideline clarity moving forward to address
the issue.<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
theme-reviewers mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers">http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<font face="Constantia, Palatino, 'Palatino Linotype'">yulian
yordanov<br>
<a href="http://post-scriptum.info/">post-scriptum.info</a></font></div>
</body>
</html>