<div>The QA issue is real and I don't vote 'for' it; still, the Trac has a number of reviews directly closed as 'non-approved' with say 2 required remarks and several subjective ones as: 'comments need more padding' or other similar factors that are more about 'up to the author' and not 'breaking the theme functionality'.</div>
<div><br></div>On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Chip Bennett <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:chip@chipbennett.net" target="_blank" class="vt-p">chip@chipbennett.net</a>></span> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div>And as others have expressed: I too want to avoid the WPTRT becoming unnecessarily bureaucratic, which is why I favor a "Reviewer's discretion" approach, both to early termination of a review of an obviously failing Theme, and to continuing the review in a subsequent ticket for "almost there" Themes.</div>
</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>+1 for that</div><div><br>Mario Peshev<br>WordPress Engineer, Open Source Consultant<br><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/mpeshev" target="_blank" class="vt-p">http://www.linkedin.com/in/mpeshev</a><br>
<div><a href="http://me.peshev.net/" target="_blank" class="vt-p">http://me.peshev.net</a></div><div><br></div></div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
<div></div></font></span></div></blockquote></div><br>