Here is the exact wording of the license, from that link:<div><br></div><div><blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px;border:none;padding:0px"><div><h4 style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px;padding-top:10px;padding-right:0px;padding-bottom:3px;padding-left:0px;font-family:'Lucida Grande',Arial,sans-serif;font-size:16px;line-height:20px;color:rgb(51,51,51);background-color:rgb(241,240,240)">
License Info</h4><p style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px;padding-top:0px;padding-right:0px;padding-bottom:1.5em;padding-left:0px;color:rgb(85,85,85);font-family:'Lucida Grande',Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12px;line-height:18px;background-color:rgb(241,240,240)">
Free to use for whatever purposes. If you use these icons, an optional link to<a href="http://icondock.com/" style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px;padding-top:0px;padding-right:0px;padding-bottom:0px;padding-left:0px;color:rgb(0,114,188);text-decoration:none;outline-style:none;outline-width:initial;outline-color:initial">http://icondock.com</a> would be appreciated. Thank you.</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div><br></div><div>This doesn't <b>explicitly </b>state the the work is released under a GPL-compatible license terms, but "whatever purposes" does implicitly include use, modification, and redistribution.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I would be in favor of considering these as "GPL-compatible".</div><div><br></div><div>Chip<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Doug Stewart <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:zamoose@gmail.com" target="_blank">zamoose@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Chip:<br>
He linked it up-thread.<br>
<a href="http://icondock.com/free/vector-social-media-icons" target="_blank">http://icondock.com/free/vector-social-media-icons</a><br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Chip Bennett <<a href="mailto:chip@chipbennett.net">chip@chipbennett.net</a>> wrote:<br>
> Bruce,<br>
><br>
> Can you link to the actual license wording/text?<br>
><br>
> Thanks,<br>
><br>
> Chip<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Bruce Wampler <<a href="mailto:weavertheme@gmail.com">weavertheme@gmail.com</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> For what it worth, the people at IconDock sent this reply to a query about<br>
>> possibly putting a more explicit license on their social icon set:<br>
>><br>
>> Hi Bruce,<br>
>><br>
>> It means 100% free for any purpose. You may distribute or resell them as<br>
>> you like.<br>
>><br>
>> Nick<br>
>><br>
>> I personally think the license on the site also makes this clear, and that<br>
>> it meets all the intent of GPL.<br>
>><br>
>> I realize that doesn't make it GPL-Compatible for the repository, but it<br>
>> does, to me, make it a safe set to use. Perhaps it could be provided via a<br>
>> user initiated upload or non-repository hosted plugin. It really is nice<br>
>> looking, and complete, and provides what is clearly a legal to use<br>
>> alternative.<br>
>><br>
>> Since there seems to be such a demand for a nice set, perhaps there could<br>
>> be a special ruling made for this particular set to allow it into the<br>
>> repository?<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Otto <<a href="mailto:otto@ottodestruct.com">otto@ottodestruct.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Syahir Hakim <<a href="mailto:khairulsyahir@gmail.com">khairulsyahir@gmail.com</a>><br>
>>> wrote:<br>
>>> > OK, so the bottom line is can we bundle these icon sets without any<br>
>>> > pre-made<br>
>>> > licences, but with the express intent that they're free for any use,<br>
>>> > with<br>
>>> > WP.org repository-hosted themes?<br>
>>><br>
>>> If you don't *know* that it is GPL-Compatible, then you cannot use it<br>
>>> in any code on WordPress.org, period.<br>
>>><br>
>>> -Otto<br>
>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a><br>
>>> <a href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers" target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> theme-reviewers mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a><br>
>> <a href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers" target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers</a><br>
>><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> theme-reviewers mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers" target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers</a><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">--<br>
-Doug<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
theme-reviewers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers" target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>