<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Emil Uzelac <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:emil@themeid.com" target="_blank">emil@themeid.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<font color="#333333"><font><font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif">Sorry for late response:</font></font></font><div><font color="#333333"><font><font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><br></font></font></font></div><div>
<font color="#333333" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b>Premium Pixels is good for Themes (at least that's what Orman says)</b></font></div><div><font color="#333333" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></div>
<div><font color="#333333" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Can I use your resources in a ThemeForest theme/template?</font></div>
<div><font color="#333333" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><i>Yes. No attribution required but appreciated. </i></font></div><div><font color="#333333" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><i>C’mon Mookie, do the right thing.</i></font></div>
<div><font color="#333333" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><i><br></i></font></div><div><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">So it should be good for WPORG I think.</span></div><div>
<span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><br></span></div><div><font color="#333333" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">This:</font></div><div class="im"><div><span><i>"You are not permitted to make the resources found on Premium Pixels available for distribution elsewhere “as is” without prior consent."</i></span></div>
<div><span><br></span></div></div><div><span>From what I can understand means that you cannot host the resource on <a href="http://example.com" target="_blank">example.com</a> it does not mean that you cannot use it. Read the text after that</span></div>
<div><span><br></span></div></blockquote><div>FULLSTOP.</div><div><br></div><div>That clause is a restriction against redistribution, and as such is clearly not compatible with GPL, which provides for redistribution of code, modified or unmodified. </div>
</div><br><div>Looks pretty cut-and-dry to me.</div><div><br></div><div>Now, the REAL issue: icon sets and images need a license analogous to the SIL Open Font license for fonts. Like fonts, icon sets and images are not really the intended use for GPL. If someone knows of such an image license, analogous to SIL Open Font, let us know. I will be happy to run it by the powers-that-be.</div>
<div><br></div><div>The only problem will remain that developers still won't be *using* said license, opting instead for CC-By, etc.</div><div><br></div><div>Chip</div>