I haven't looked deep into the code, but if you believe the functionality being offered by the theme goes above and beyond the standard implementation recommended to be used in the guidelines then it can be noted but I do not believe it would push the theme over to a "not-approved" resolution ...<br>
<br>... I'll see if I can find some time to look into the code myself as well.<br><br><br clear="all">Cais.<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Caroline Moore <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:calobee@gmail.com">calobee@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi all,<div><br></div><div>I'm working on the PageLines review. The theme uses custom functions to add headers and custom backgrounds (instead of add_custom_image_header or add_custom_background).</div><div><br></div>
<div>I'm assuming this is OK since this theme is kind of a special case. I can see where, in the interests of keeping all the theme's options in one place, it makes more sense to use custom functions. It also looks as though the functionality offered is more complex than the WordPress defaults.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Let me know if I'm not on the right track with that thinking.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks!</div><div>Caro</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
theme-reviewers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers" target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>