I crunched a few numbers based on reviews done in the last 90 days. A few interesting notes:<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>37 reviewers did 405 reviews in the last 90 days.<div><br></div><div>Emil Uzelac, Reigning Champion, did a whopping 107 reviews, 26% of all reviews.</div>
<div><br></div><div>The five Rock Stars were responsible for 62% of all reviews.</div><div><br></div><div>30% of reviewers (the Worker Bees and Rock Stars) did 10 reviews or more, accounting for 82% of all reviews.</div>
<div>
<br></div><div><br></div><div>Rock Stars (30+ reviews):</div><div><ul><li>emiluzelac (107)</li><li>chipbennett (43)</li><li>sabreuse (35)</li><li>saymar90 (34)</li><li>SeizedPropaganda (31)</li></ul></div><div><br></div>
<div>
Worker Bees (10+ reviews):</div><div><ul><li>nofearinc (21)</li><li>garinungkadol (16)</li><li>mercime (13)</li><li>kwight (12)</li><li>mattr123 (11)</li><li>reviewWP (10)</li></ul><div><br></div></div></div><div>Clearly, most of the heavy lifting is done by very few... It woud be nice, as Chip suggested yesterday, if all reviewers could pitch in even a little bit on a semi-regular basis; it would bring things under control quite quickly, and spread the load around so that if a Rock Star reduces their rate (or walks away - a possibility at any time for volunteers), we can keep rolling.</div>
<div><br></div><div>A final interesting point: approximately the same number of reviewers did 740 reviews in the 90 days previous; that's kick-ass. </div><div><br></div><div>I'll commit to 3 reviews a week for now - how about you?</div>
<div><br></div>