I can't speak for anyone else but I don't see anything wrong with that second group of domain names. Now that does mean that the content of the sites themselves are compliant but the domains seem fine. <br><br>The first domain feels a little spammy. :-)<br>
<br>James<br><br>On Thursday, December 22, 2011, Mario Peshev <<a href="mailto:mario@peshev.net">mario@peshev.net</a>> wrote:<br>> Few more samples while we're on this:<br>> tastythemes dot net - WP themes repository, even has submission link <br>
> themesweet dot com - studio for WP themes<br>> studiobrain dot net<br>> webtuts dot pl - WP tutorials page<br>> Anything wrong with this urls?<br>><br>> Mario Peshev<br>> Training and Consulting Services @ DevriX<br>
> <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/mpeshev">http://www.linkedin.com/in/mpeshev</a><br>> <a href="http://devrix.com">http://devrix.com</a><br>> <a href="http://peshev.net/blog">http://peshev.net/blog</a><br>><br>
><br>><br>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Mario Peshev <<a href="mailto:mario@peshev.net">mario@peshev.net</a>> wrote:<br>>><br>>> Hello everyone,<br>>> I've always found too blurry the area of SEO/SPAM related domains and links in Author/Theme URI + footer credit links. Currently looking at a theme linked to free travel website templates dot com - as author URI + footer link. Is it subject to guidelines violation? Can we edit the guidelines and provide several examples of seo-like urls for better understanding of both reviewers and authors?<br>
>><br>>> Mario Peshev<br>>> Training and Consulting Services @ DevriX<br>>> <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/mpeshev">http://www.linkedin.com/in/mpeshev</a><br>>> <a href="http://devrix.com">http://devrix.com</a><br>
>> <a href="http://peshev.net/blog">http://peshev.net/blog</a><br>>><br>><br>>