As a grammatical pedant, I cannot stand the use of a split infinitive such as "required to not [something]". :)<div><br></div><div>Chip<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Tony Crockford <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tonyc@boldfish.co.uk">tonyc@boldfish.co.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im">On Thu Nov 10 2011 16:06:53 Mario Peshev wrote:<br>
><br>
> For me - yes. Just not quite sure if it is 100% English-acceptable<br>
> "REQUIRED to NOT", if so, than discussion is over for me.<br>
<br>
</div>To me it feels more of a comfortable English usage, making it clear what you are required to not do, if that construction makes more sense to non-English speakers than it would ultimately be clearer?<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
theme-reviewers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers" target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>