<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
    That's perfectly fine.<br>
    <br>
    The stylesheets that must be enqueued are additional stylesheets
    other than the main style.css if you're adding them to the header. 
    wp_enqueue_style() should be used as opposed to adding &lt;link
    rel="stylesheet"&gt; directly to header.php.<br>
    <br>
    On 10/19/2011 2:32 PM, Paul de Wouters wrote:
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:1331dabd383.2050240588410328583.-9087783946457237099@zoho.com"
      type="cite">
      <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
      <font class="Apple-style-span" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica,
        sans-serif">Hi</font>
      <div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Verdana, Arial,
          Helvetica, sans-serif"><br>
        </font></div>
      <div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Verdana, Arial,
          Helvetica, sans-serif">In the theme review guide by Chip, it
          says stylesheets must be enqueued, so does that mean that if
          the main stylesheet is empty except for 3 @import
          declarations, the theme isn't valid?<br>
        </font>
        <div id="1" style="font-family:
          Verdana,arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br>
          ---- On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:00:02 -0200 <b> &lt;<a
              moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:theme-reviewers-request@lists.wordpress.org"
              target="_blank">theme-reviewers-request@lists.wordpress.org</a>&gt;</b>
          wrote ---- <br>
        </div>
        <br>
        <blockquote style="font-family:
          Verdana,arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; border-left: 1px solid
          rgb(0, 0, 255); padding-left: 6px;">Send theme-reviewers
          mailing list submissions to <br>
              <a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org"
            target="_blank">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a> <br>
          <br>
          To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit <br>
              <a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers"
            target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers</a>
          <br>
          or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to <br>
              <a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:theme-reviewers-request@lists.wordpress.org"
            target="_blank">theme-reviewers-request@lists.wordpress.org</a>
          <br>
          <br>
          You can reach the person managing the list at <br>
              <a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:theme-reviewers-owner@lists.wordpress.org"
            target="_blank">theme-reviewers-owner@lists.wordpress.org</a>
          <br>
          <br>
          When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
          specific <br>
          than "Re: Contents of theme-reviewers digest..." <br>
          <br>
          <br>
          Today's Topics: <br>
          <br>
          1. Re: [WordPress Themes] Custom Community, new version 1.8.7
          (Otto) <br>
          2. Re: [WordPress Themes] Custom Community, new version 1.8.7
          (Otto) <br>
          3. Re: [WordPress Themes] Custom Community, new version 1.8.7
          <br>
          (Chip Bennett) <br>
          <br>
          <br>
          ----------------------------------------------------------------------
          <br>
          <br>
          Message: 1 <br>
          Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:53:41 -0500 <br>
          From: Otto &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:otto@ottodestruct.com" target="_blank">otto@ottodestruct.com</a>&gt;
          <br>
          Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] [WordPress Themes] Custom
          Community, <br>
              new version 1.8.7 <br>
          To: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org"
            target="_blank">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a> <br>
          Message-ID: <br>
              &lt;CAD-FghxE8dhO5WfuLd+q<a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:KmKFnx3FnELjL-9jmH6XpC3RQRHUOA@mail.gmail.com"
            target="_blank">KmKFnx3FnELjL-9jmH6XpC3RQRHUOA@mail.gmail.com</a>&gt;
          <br>
          Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 <br>
          <br>
          On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Chip Bennett &lt;<a
            moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:chip@chipbennett.net"
            target="_blank">chip@chipbennett.net</a>&gt; wrote: <br>
          &gt; We "mark as old" Themes that are not-approved. They stay
          in the Extend queue <br>
          &gt; until we do so. <br>
          <br>
          Oh. <br>
          <br>
          The upload process automatically marks any previous pending
          versions <br>
          of a theme as "old" when a new version gets uploaded, so
          assuming the <br>
          theme author is going to fix the problems with the theme, the
          old <br>
          version will disappear when they upload a new one. <br>
          <br>
          So unless you're picky about an orderly pending list, it's not
          <br>
          actually necessary to take that step. <br>
          <br>
          -Otto <br>
          <br>
          <br>
          ------------------------------ <br>
          <br>
          Message: 2 <br>
          Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:56:12 -0500 <br>
          From: Otto &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:otto@ottodestruct.com" target="_blank">otto@ottodestruct.com</a>&gt;
          <br>
          Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] [WordPress Themes] Custom
          Community, <br>
              new version 1.8.7 <br>
          To: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org"
            target="_blank">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a> <br>
          Message-ID: <br>
              &lt;CAD-Fghye8qQPDCiWK7sT<a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:v8no5d_LFY4O2qy2XhB7jLdR-VanDA@mail.gmail.com"
            target="_blank">v8no5d_LFY4O2qy2XhB7jLdR-VanDA@mail.gmail.com</a>&gt;
          <br>
          Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 <br>
          <br>
          On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Chip Bennett &lt;<a
            moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:chip@chipbennett.net"
            target="_blank">chip@chipbennett.net</a>&gt; wrote: <br>
          &gt; If we went a route similar to this, I would propose that
          instead of using <br>
          &gt; PRIORITY, we update the Trac workflow to add an
          additional STATE, of <br>
          &gt; "review-complete" (or whatever is appropriate). <br>
          &gt; And if we go this route, I would suggest looking into
          adding a TRAINEE user <br>
          &gt; level, for which the only elevated permission is to
          change the ticket state <br>
          &gt; to "review-complete". <br>
          &gt; From purely a workflow standpoint, using the "needs-sync"
          priority is really <br>
          &gt; no improvement over using keywords (either way, the admin
          still has to <br>
          &gt; change the priority, just as the admin currently has to
          remove the sync <br>
          &gt; keyword). <br>
          <br>
          Agreed on the workflow, however that's a bit beyond what I
          have the <br>
          capability to easily alter at present. I've emailed the
          sysadmins <br>
          about a similar change, when they get back to me I'm going to
          try to <br>
          get a copy of the existing ini file and set up a test trac.
          Then I can <br>
          see about making some changes to the workflow. <br>
          <br>
          -Otto <br>
          <br>
          <br>
          ------------------------------ <br>
          <br>
          Message: 3 <br>
          Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:00:37 -0500 <br>
          From: Chip Bennett &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:chip@chipbennett.net" target="_blank">chip@chipbennett.net</a>&gt;
          <br>
          Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] [WordPress Themes] Custom
          Community, <br>
              new version 1.8.7 <br>
          To: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org"
            target="_blank">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a> <br>
          Message-ID: <br>
              &lt;CAPdLKqewFqFJo+mKoh-5<a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:f1FRnuV+e6CU06c+XZ3QMdVSyRVTvg@mail.gmail.com"
            target="_blank">f1FRnuV+e6CU06c+XZ3QMdVSyRVTvg@mail.gmail.com</a>&gt;
          <br>
          Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" <br>
          <br>
          The assumption that Theme developers re-submit their Themes
          with fixes is... <br>
          not terribly valid, unfortunately. <br>
          <br>
          Also, having the Extend queue as clean as possible helps to
          find the Themes <br>
          that need to be synchronized as *live*. <br>
          <br>
          And: you know me. I'm way past "picky"; I'm a pedant. <br>
          <br>
          Chip <br>
          <br>
          On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Otto &lt;<a
            moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:otto@ottodestruct.com"
            target="_blank">otto@ottodestruct.com</a>&gt; wrote: <br>
          <br>
          &gt; On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Chip Bennett &lt;<a
            moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:chip@chipbennett.net"
            target="_blank">chip@chipbennett.net</a>&gt; <br>
          &gt; wrote: <br>
          &gt; &gt; We "mark as old" Themes that are not-approved. They
          stay in the Extend <br>
          &gt; queue <br>
          &gt; &gt; until we do so. <br>
          &gt; <br>
          &gt; Oh. <br>
          &gt; <br>
          &gt; The upload process automatically marks any previous
          pending versions <br>
          &gt; of a theme as "old" when a new version gets uploaded, so
          assuming the <br>
          &gt; theme author is going to fix the problems with the theme,
          the old <br>
          &gt; version will disappear when they upload a new one. <br>
          &gt; <br>
          &gt; So unless you're picky about an orderly pending list,
          it's not <br>
          &gt; actually necessary to take that step. <br>
          &gt; <br>
          &gt; -Otto <br>
          &gt; _______________________________________________ <br>
          &gt; theme-reviewers mailing list <br>
          &gt; <a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org"
            target="_blank">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a> <br>
          &gt; <a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers"
            target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers</a>
          <br>
          &gt; <br>
          -------------- next part -------------- <br>
          An HTML attachment was scrubbed... <br>
          URL: &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20111018/c36c1f97/attachment-0001.htm"
            target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20111018/c36c1f97/attachment-0001.htm</a>&gt;
          <br>
          <br>
          ------------------------------ <br>
          <br>
          _______________________________________________ <br>
          theme-reviewers mailing list <br>
          <a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org"
            target="_blank">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a> <br>
          <a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers"
            target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers</a>
          <br>
          <br>
          <br>
          End of theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 17, Issue 60 <br>
          *********************************************** <br>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
      </div>
      <pre wrap="">
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
_______________________________________________
theme-reviewers mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers">http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>