The assumption that Theme developers re-submit their Themes with fixes is... not terribly valid, unfortunately.<div><br></div><div>Also, having the Extend queue as clean as possible helps to find the Themes that need to be synchronized as *live*.</div>
<div><br></div><div>And: you know me. I'm way past "picky"; I'm a pedant.</div><div><br></div><div>Chip<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Otto <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:otto@ottodestruct.com">otto@ottodestruct.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im">On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Chip Bennett <<a href="mailto:chip@chipbennett.net">chip@chipbennett.net</a>> wrote:<br>
> We "mark as old" Themes that are not-approved. They stay in the Extend queue<br>
> until we do so.<br>
<br>
</div>Oh.<br>
<br>
The upload process automatically marks any previous pending versions<br>
of a theme as "old" when a new version gets uploaded, so assuming the<br>
theme author is going to fix the problems with the theme, the old<br>
version will disappear when they upload a new one.<br>
<br>
So unless you're picky about an orderly pending list, it's not<br>
actually necessary to take that step.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
-Otto<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
theme-reviewers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers" target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>