I see no real cause for concern with the site itself, it seems to fall well within a good Author URI landing page/site ... although I could not find (quickly) any statement regarding the licensing they use except for the SIL licensed fonts. If they are releasing custom themes directly to and only for their customers use then that is not an issue; if they start releasing premium (read: paid) themes from the same site then the question of GPL-compatibility will enter into the equation.<br>
<br>Otherwise, I'd approve the Author URI in and of itself.<br><br><br clear="all">Cais.<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Caroline Moore <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:calobee@gmail.com">calobee@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Hi all,<br>
<br>
Sorry if this is obvious, but it's my first review and I wanted to be sure.<br>
<br>
The Author URI for the theme is listed as <a href="http://imedia-emagine.com/" target="_blank">http://imedia-emagine.com/</a><br>
<br>
Does it qualify as a "project/development website" (as per the theme review guidelines) if they're also selling custom design/theme development services?<br>
<br>
Thanks much,<br>
Caroline<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
theme-reviewers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org" target="_blank">theme-reviewers@lists.<u></u>wordpress.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers" target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/theme-<u></u>reviewers</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>