On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 1:00 AM, Darren Slatten <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:darrenslatten@gmail.com">darrenslatten@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
I'm not sure if you realize this, but so far no one has been able to provide a reason for rejecting my code example.<br></blockquote><div><br>By your own admission:<br><br><blockquote style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote">
My solution provides an equal opportunity for users to write
poorly-written code or well-written code. Yes, the solution itself is a
dirty fix, but that doesn't mean the code within the solution is
inherently poorly-written. I'm not saying my solution is ideal or
elegant by any means--I'm only saying a dirty fix is better than no fix,
and the end justifies the means.<br></blockquote><div><br>No, it doesn't provide _equal_ opportunity for users to write poorly-written code or well-written code. Most of the time, they will write crappy code, given the nature of the filter.<br>
</div><br>"And that's all I have to say about that."<br><br></div></div>-- <br><a href="http://scribu.net" target="_blank">http://scribu.net</a><br>