The current workflow works, as long as it is attended to every day ... unfortunately I have been very busy with other projects to keep it within the maximum 24 hour turn-around I expected/maintained.<br><br>As my plans to day have been completely blown out of the water, I'll go in and make sure everything is back in sync (approved, not-approved, etc.)<br>
<br><br>Cais.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Chip Bennett <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:chip@chipbennett.net">chip@chipbennett.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Synching is not only a manual process, it is a rather tedious manual process. Extend has no knowledge of a given ticket's resolution, and we currently have no way in Trac of queueing tickets that require resolution.<div>
<br></div><div>I have an idea, that we can try. It may or may not work, but it's worth a shot.</div><div><br></div><div>REVIEWERS: when you close a ticket as APPROVED, add the following keyword to the ticket: "syncapproved". That way, we can add a Trac report around this keyword, and won't have to search for approved Themes that need to be synced. This way, whomever does the sync can just remove the keyword from the ticket.</div>
<div><br></div><div>(If you want to be extra helpful, for tickets closed as not-approved or newer-version-uploaded, add this keyword to the ticket: "synchold". But getting the *approved* Themes synced as quickly as possible is far more important than syncing *old* (i.e. not-approved or newer-version-uploaded) tickets.)</div>
<div><br></div><div>After having helped with the Trac-Extend sync for a few weeks now, I'm fairly convinced that this method would be more efficient than the current workflow.</div><div><br></div><div><font color="#888888">Chip<br>
<br></font><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im">
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Otto <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:otto@ottodestruct.com" target="_blank">otto@ottodestruct.com</a>></span> wrote:<br></div><div><div></div><div class="h5"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 5:55 AM, Daniel Tara <<a href="mailto:contact@onedesigns.com" target="_blank">contact@onedesigns.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Is there anything wrong with the synch operation?<br>
> Otto, do you know anything about this?<br>
<br>
</div>There is no sync operation, all the themes have to be approved<br>
manually by the mods of the theme system, which is basically Chip,<br>
Pross, Cais, and Emil.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
-Otto<br>
</font><div><div></div><div>_______________________________________________<br>
theme-reviewers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org" target="_blank">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers" target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div></div></div><br></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
theme-reviewers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers" target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>