<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 14:22, Otto <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:otto@ottodestruct.com">otto@ottodestruct.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>
Also, there's no benefit to serving both an Atom and an RSS feed. The<br>
content is the same and all feed readers can process both. Giving end<br>
users a meaningless choice isn't very good UX. Pick one or the other<br>
and just roll with it.<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I disagree strongly that the content is the same... Oh! Wait... So do you: "Atom is better designed, more robust, well-defined, and supports publish capabilities as well." from your own plugin page <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/atom-default-feed/">http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/atom-default-feed/</a></div>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><div><br></div><div>The differences are too technical and not relevant for this mailing list, see this link for a balanced article on the subject: <a href="http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/Rss20AndAtom10Compared">http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/Rss20AndAtom10Compared</a></div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><div>Mike</div></div>-- <br>Mike Little<div><a href="http://zed1.com/" target="_blank">http://zed1.com/</a></div><div><br></div>
<br>