Yes, this is a long standing discussion.<br><br>Keep in mind most "old themes" will fail (some epically) the rigors of "Theme-Check" so it is not necessarily the best benchmark to be using.<br><br><br>Cais.<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Jonny Cauvain <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:furcifer@furcifer.me">furcifer@furcifer.me</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<p>We're still in the process of working that out.</p>
<p></p><blockquote type="cite"><div class="im">On 29 Mar 2011 15:20, "carolina n" <<a href="mailto:myazalea@hotmail.com" target="_blank">myazalea@hotmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br>
<div>
<br>
What is the plan for the old themes in the directory that has not been reviewed or run trough the theme-check?<br>
<br>
<br> </div>
<br></div>_______________________________________________<br>
theme-reviewers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org" target="_blank">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers" target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers</a><br>
<br></blockquote><p></p>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
theme-reviewers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers" target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>