Has it been a month already?!<br><br>I was going to suggest the end of the month so we start on April 1 ... but some may take that the wrong way (*grin*)<br><br>I'm good with the 30 days "grace" period we originally discussed.<br>
<br><br>Cais.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Amy <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sabreuse@gmail.com">sabreuse@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Let's do it!<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
On Mar 21, 2011, at 2:25 PM, Otto <<a href="mailto:otto@ottodestruct.com">otto@ottodestruct.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> I recently resynched the theme check on the uploader to the latest<br>
> version of the theme check plugin, to add the 3.1 checks to the<br>
> uploader too.<br>
><br>
> At one time, we discussed making the theme check there require a<br>
> mandatory pass for allowing the theme to be uploaded at all. The<br>
> timeline suggested for this was one month after the release of 3.1. We<br>
> are now at that point in time, and so unless there is a good reason<br>
> not to do so, I plan on making that change this week.<br>
><br>
> What this means:<br>
><br>
> Right now, the uploader does print out the results of the theme check,<br>
> along with the computed "pass" or "fail". There are currently only a<br>
> few conditions that will cause the uploader to abort and not submit<br>
> the theme. The more wide-ranging theme check has been purely advisory<br>
> until now, it does not affect the ability to upload the theme.<br>
><br>
> This change would make any "fail" condition from the theme uploader<br>
> abort in the same manner, and stop the theme from being uploaded.<br>
> Getting a "pass" on the theme check would be a requirement.<br>
><br>
> The result of this would be to reduce the number of submissions in<br>
> trac, and reduce the need of the reviewers to run theme check<br>
> themselves, as a pass would be assured for it to even make it that<br>
> far.<br>
><br>
> Note that not all messages produced by theme check produce a fail. The<br>
> "recommended" and "info" items, for example, are merely informational,<br>
> they don't affect the pass/fail case. Only the warnings and requireds<br>
> and such cause a theme to fail the check.<br>
><br>
> If anybody has any objections or suggestions or even just thoughts,<br>
> now's the time to talk about them.<br>
><br>
> -Otto<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> theme-reviewers mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers" target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
theme-reviewers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers" target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>