Okay, now it's probably time to give it a rest. This is becoming a waste of time.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Satish Gandham <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:satish.iitg@gmail.com">satish.iitg@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">+1 Rahul.<br><br>Back in 2008, 200 themes were removed from the repository as their authors promoted themes that are not 100% GPL on their sites.<br>
<br>And when platform was approved, they were selling themes that are not 100% GPL.<br>
<br><a href="http://files.droplr.com/files/17962094/DCMW.not-100-percent-gpl.png" target="_blank">http://files.droplr.com/files/17962094/DCMW.not-100-percent-gpl.png</a><br><br><a href="http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:-HyUwkEIZpYJ:pagelines.com/themes/terms/+ur+website+grants+you+non-exclusive+limited+license+to+use+the+web+templates+and+other+products+sold+through+our+website+%28http://www.pagelines.com%29+by&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=in&client=firefox-a&source=www.google.co.in" target="_blank">http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:-HyUwkEIZpYJ:pagelines.com/themes/terms/+ur+website+grants+you+non-exclusive+limited+license+to+use+the+web+templates+and+other+products+sold+through+our+website+%28http://www.pagelines.com%29+by&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=in&client=firefox-a&source=www.google.co.in</a></blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>The Theme Review Team was formed in June of 2010 - a f<i>ull two years</i> after that Repository purge. If you can't grasp the significance of that point, then we're probably done here.</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>How can you go easy on some themes, and pester other themes.<br><br><br>As Rahul suggested, having a complete set of rules on the codex will be better for the community rather than leaving it to the discretion of the reviewer.<br>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>We DO have a complete set of Guidelines. However, it's not set in stone. We do our best to keep it updated, but (again) we're not perfect. </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br><br>PS: I fixed all the problems pointed out in the earlier review and the new version is here<br><a href="http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/2984" target="_blank">http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/2984</a><br>
<br>previous ticket<br>
<a href="http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/2982" target="_blank">http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/2982</a><br><br>Please review it without pushing it down the queue.<br><br></blockquote><div>Wait a minute: you've just wasted the better part of the <i>past 20 hours railing against favoritism</i> allegedly being shown to some Themes, and then you <i>ask for favoritism for your own Theme</i>?</div>
<div><br></div><div>Is that irony, hypocrisy, or merely hubris?</div><div><br></div><div>I'm pretty sure I'm done with this thread, because I can't foresee anything else beneficial coming from it.</div><div><br>
</div><div>Chip</div></div>