Is filtering (without user consent) any more acceptable than hard-coding? The primary issue isn't the method of implementation, but rather the propriety.<div><br></div><div>Chip<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Simon Prosser <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pross@pross.org.uk">pross@pross.org.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im">On 10/19/10 21:42, Austin Matzko wrote:<br>
> Perhaps you could recommend that there be a way to change the favicon,<br>
> either by option or filter<br>
</div>What about: If a theme has an options page then it should be an option,<br>
if not then it should at least be filtered.<br>
<br>
bear in mind that 99.99% of users will not know what a filter is.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
--<br>
My Blog : <a href="http://www.pross.org.uk/" target="_blank">http://www.pross.org.uk/</a><br>
Plugins : <a href="http://www.pross.org.uk/plugins/" target="_blank">http://www.pross.org.uk/plugins/</a><br>
Themes : <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/profile/pross" target="_blank">http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/profile/pross</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
</div><div><div></div><div class="h5">theme-reviewers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers" target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>