@Mel -<br><br>I agree it's worth noting the differences ... and I believe it would fit well in the naming convention section of the Theme Review page.<br><br><br>Cais.<br><br>PS: Have a look: <a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review#Theme_Name">http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review#Theme_Name</a> EAC<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 5:27 AM, esmi at quirm dot net <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:esmi@quirm.net">esmi@quirm.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
on 13/10/2010 00:48 Edward Caissie said the following:<br>
<snip><div class="im"><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Although I do agree with you that authors should not be surprised by a<br>
folder structure change as you have found with your theme. Perhaps it can be<br>
put forward for Twenty Ten to be changed to TwentyTen which would be more<br>
consistent and set a better example.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Would it be worth adding a line to the Theme Review Guidelines about folder names? Perhaps a recommendation that authors avoid compound names in favour of hyphenated ones? I realise that the uploader is currently going to do this for them but I think it needs mentioning somewhere.<br>
<br>
Mel<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
-- <br>
WordPress theme developer<br>
<a href="http://quirm.net" target="_blank">http://quirm.net</a><br>
<a href="http://blackwidows.co.uk" target="_blank">http://blackwidows.co.uk</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
theme-reviewers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org" target="_blank">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers" target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>