In my mind, given all the recent changes to the information being delivered by Trac, we could take the resolutions down to three (or four).<br><br><ol><li>Approved - obvious, I would hope.<br></li><li>( Suggest-Approval - temporary, once the theme is "Approved" in extend this could be changed to Approved. )</li>
<li>Not-Approved - changed from "not-accepted"<br></li><li>closed-newer-version-uploaded - the only resolution that closes a ticket if it's not set by one of the above points.<br></li></ol>The "needs-additional-review" is rarely used and if Theme Reviewers are reading their ticket emails (everyone gets those, correct?) they will see when someone needs to step in and have a second (or third?) set of eyes on a ticket ...<br>
<br>Using the "Accepted" status in place of the "Approved" resolution would just leave a great many open tickets wouldn't it? ... or perhaps I am not understanding the idea?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Simon Prosser <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pross@pross.org.uk">pross@pross.org.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
thing is cais/otto, if we ditch approved and use accespted instead, i think the status for accepted is open? aproved closes the ticket...unless it can be modified<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On 1 October 2010 12:33, Edward Caissie <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:edward.caissie@gmail.com" target="_blank">edward.caissie@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">I thought as much for the status "accepted" ... and, yes, when you get a moment let's change the "not-accepted" resolution to "not-approved" it may also improve the connotative meaning being associated to the ticket resolutions as well.<br>
<br>Perhaps that will help when explaining it to those not understanding the Trac status details.<br><br>Thanks,<br><br><br>Cais.<div><div></div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 5:41 AM, Otto <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:otto@ottodestruct.com" target="_blank">otto@ottodestruct.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div>On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:37 AM, Otto <<a href="mailto:otto@ottodestruct.com" target="_blank">otto@ottodestruct.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Edward Caissie <<a href="mailto:edward.caissie@gmail.com" target="_blank">edward.caissie@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> This is Trac related, it seems the "accepted" status is causing confusion<br>
>> for some of the Theme authors, is it possible to remove that "option" or<br>
>> make it unavailable? The core review team does not use it and it seems to be<br>
>> confusing some of the "new" reviewers as well, there are enough resolution<br>
>> options AFAIK that satisfy most if not all our current concerns and could<br>
>> easily be used instead of the misleading "accepted" status.<br>
><br>
> I don't see any "accepted" status. To what are you referring?<br>
<br>
</div>Oh, I get it. You mean the accepted for when a user assigns it to themselves.<br>
<br>
Short answer is no, that is built into trac. It means it's been<br>
accepted by a person to review. The "Owned by" gets set, basically.<br>
<br>
I would suggest changing the "not-accepted" to something else, like<br>
"not approved", to avoid confusion.<br>
<div><div></div><div><br>
-Otto<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
theme-reviewers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org" target="_blank">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers" target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
theme-reviewers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org" target="_blank">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers" target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br></div></div><div><div></div><div class="h5">-- <br>My Blog: <a href="http://www.pross.org.uk/" target="_blank">http://www.pross.org.uk/</a><br>Plugins : <a href="http://www.pross.org.uk/plugins/" target="_blank">http://www.pross.org.uk/plugins/</a><br>
Themes: <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/profile/pross" target="_blank">http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/profile/pross</a><br>
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
theme-reviewers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers" target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>