On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:philip@frumph.net" target="_blank">philip@frumph.net</a>></span> wrote:<div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Furthermore let's talk about ionfish how he has functions calling hooks instead of just embedding the hook in the location used .. erm.. why? .. yeah I would call that unneeded unnecessary coding. </blockquote><div>
<br></div><div>We're rejecting quality, extremely well coded themes on narrow technical grounds. It's not even a new theme. It's a minor update to a long-time existing one that is terrifically coded and wildly popular; it's a step in the right direction. This kind of rejection goes against the primary goals of the theme reviews. I see no reason why this theme update should not be approved. Not on the basis of it being rejected initially, not on a cursory review of the codebase, and not on this email, either.</div>
</div>