Thanks for the "heads up", Nacin;<br><br>We'll look into referencing this on the Theme Review page(s), too.<br><br><br>Cais.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Andrew Nacin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wp@andrewnacin.com">wp@andrewnacin.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">A heads up, I've removed references to read-only parameters for add_theme_support() from <a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Function_Reference/add_theme_support" target="_blank">http://codex.wordpress.org/Function_Reference/add_theme_support</a>.<div>
<br></div><div>Any theme enabling 'editor-style', 'menus', 'custom-header', 'custom-background', or 'widgets' via add_theme_support() is doing it wrong. These are internal registrations so we can transparently use current_theme_support(). In fact WordPress prevents these in particular from being removed via remove_theme_support(), that way there are no imbalances.</div>
<div><br></div><font color="#888888"><div>Nacin</div>
</font><br>_______________________________________________<br>
theme-reviewers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers" target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>