<div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Andrew Nacin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wp@andrewnacin.com">wp@andrewnacin.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Chip Bennett <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:chip@chipbennett.net" target="_blank">chip@chipbennett.net</a>></span> wrote:<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
So, after doing I-don't-know-how-many reviews, I finally got to mark one today as "suggest approval"!</blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>I'm not sure if that is an indictment of the quality of themes, or the theme review requirements.</div>
</div>
<br></blockquote><div>Do you have *specific* examples of onerous or unnecessary review requirements? Quite honestly, the review queue remains steady at 60+ Themes. We don't have time for navel-gazing. But if there are *specific* requirements that need to be addressed, we're always up for looking at them. (I've actually got a couple to bring up myself, regarding the Theme Unit Tests.) </div>
<div><br></div><div>Chip</div></div><br>