<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Edward Caissie <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:edward.caissie@gmail.com">edward.caissie@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
I agree with Phil on this given the example below ... and with never supporting the Customer Header Image function as required, too.<br><br>My concern (without looking at the theme), does the logo act as an advertisement for the theme author? It starts to get really grey if it does ...<br>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>No. The default logo is just the Theme Name (Food Recipe), which is a semantically accurate default logo for the intended use. I'm not seeing it as a problem.</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>Cais.<br><br>PS: As one of my themes has three major CSS based image areas in the header, until Custom Header Image (or whatever its called) supports multiple instances in the header via core it will remain as recommended IMO. EAC.</blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>I would say that your Theme isn't *intended* for the header image to be *customizable*. Key difference. </div><div><br></div><div>I don't think we're looking at making support a requirement (for many good reasons).</div>
<div><br></div><div>The question is: is this Theme implementing customizable header image functionality, which, according to the guidelines, *should* be implemented in a way that supports the core feature. </div><div><br>
</div><div>The way I'm looking at it, I really think it does. And would be dead-simple to implement.</div><div><br></div><div>Chip</div></div>