I look at any single significant item as a reason to resolve a theme to "not-accept" and a courtesy to continue with a general review for other major items.<br><br>It is completely the authors responsibility to meet all of the expected standards and criteria it is not the theme reviewer's responsibility to test beyond a reasonable limit if issues are found.<br>
<br><br>Cais.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:36 AM, yulian yordanov <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:yul.yordanov@gmail.com">yul.yordanov@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Summarizing my experience in theme testing, I think if a theme is missing license it should not be tested further. In most cases it is just omitted but there exist an hypothesis certain themes to be submitted only for testing and reviewing. Since this is a voluntary activity it's better not speculate with it.<br>
And in this way of thoughts it will be useful if the process of license checking is (somehow) automatized during upload.<br>
<br>
<br>
Yulian <Fingli><br>
<br>
<br>
P.S. Do you read the license.txt attached to themes you test? ;)<br>
<br>
-- <br>
<br>
Þëèÿí Éîðäàíîâ<br>
<br>
Yulian Yordanov<br>
<a href="http://post-scriptum.info/" target="_blank">http://post-scriptum.info/</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
theme-reviewers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org" target="_blank">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers" target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>