[theme-reviewers] accessibility-ready tag

Chip Bennett chip at chipbennett.net
Sat Apr 12 18:17:15 UTC 2014


Consider this thread a follow-up. Otto follows the list. :)


On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Joe Dolson <design at joedolson.com> wrote:

> I think it might be time to follow up.  If there weren't so many missed
> themes,  I wouldn't be concerned,  but with no real recourse to mediate the
> themes that aren't reviewed, we need something more automated to pick up on
> this.
> On Apr 12, 2014 1:00 PM, "Chip Bennett" <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>
>> Otto is a busy guy; I tend not to bug him too frequently about those
>> sorts of things. :) So, yeah; I never followed up on it.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Joe Dolson <design at joedolson.com> wrote:
>>
>>> But there are several themes that were approved without ever getting the
>>> keyword, so it's not happening every time.
>>>
>>> This was something that Otto had said he was creating. Conversation was
>>> Feb. 10th. Chip requested:
>>>
>>> "Would it be possible to have Theme-Trac add a ticket keyword - "
>>> accessibility-ready" - to tickets for Themes that have the "
>>> accessibility-ready" keyword? That would save us the step of having to
>>> rely on the reviewer to add the ticket keyword manually.
>>>
>>> Note: the accessibility reviewers will be using a report that currently
>>> relies on the "accessibility-ready" ticket keyword:
>>> https://themes.trac.wordpress.org/report/9"
>>>
>>> Otto responded that he'd do it tomorrow, at the time, but I don't know
>>> where it went from there.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Joe
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> no i see the autogenerated keywords all the time and that's why i cc
>>>> Joe.
>>>> but they are added after assigning the ticket to myself.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I've thus far gotten no feedback on auto-generating trac keywords
>>>>> based on keyword tags.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's still a manual process. Reviewers need to be aware of the
>>>>> presence of the "accessibility-ready" tag. If you're unsure how to handle
>>>>> it, please ask.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Joe Dolson <design at joedolson.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The process for handling this still isn't working quite right, I
>>>>>> think - there are 4 themes with the accessibility-ready tag that haven't
>>>>>> gone through the review process, to the best of my knowledge.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://wordpress.org/themes/ward
>>>>>> http://wordpress.org/themes/infinite
>>>>>> http://wordpress.org/themes/nuvioelement-orange
>>>>>> http://wordpress.org/themes/nuviofuturemag-red
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What can we do about themes that were missed in this process? I
>>>>>> thought there was supposed to be some automated keywords added for
>>>>>> accessibility-ready themes, but that doesn't seem to be happening, or at
>>>>>> least not consistently.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Joe
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Once Themes are live, they are... live. At that point, if they claim
>>>>>>> "accessibility-ready" and aren't, then we're falsely advertising to end
>>>>>>> users. So, yes: Themes that claim "accessibility-ready' have to pass
>>>>>>> accessibility review before being made live.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do themes have to pass accessibility-ready test during the initial
>>>>>>>> review or do they get checked for that after they go live?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> ==================
>>>>>> Joseph Dolson
>>>>>> Accessibility consultant & WordPress developer
>>>>>> http://www.joedolson.com
>>>>>> http://profiles.wordpress.org/joedolson
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ==================
>>> Joseph Dolson
>>> Accessibility consultant & WordPress developer
>>> http://www.joedolson.com
>>> http://profiles.wordpress.org/joedolson
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20140412/e1013445/attachment.html>


More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list