[theme-reviewers] Theme Unit Test XML file fixed

Srikanth Koneru tskk79 at gmail.com
Sat May 11 12:46:04 UTC 2013


I have the same problem too, imported it into the totally new WP install
created manually.
Also the nested lists in comments use <p> instead of <li>


On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Amy Hendrix <sabreuse at gmail.com> wrote:

> The scheduled post is scheduled for July 27, 2030, as you can confirm
> for yourself if you look at the raw XML in a text editor. I did
> several fresh imports yesterday, and all of them work as expected -- I
> suspect that something in your setup is choking on the future date and
> failing over to Jan 1, 1970 (which is a timestamp of 0)
>
> On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Abhik Biswas <abhik at itsabhik.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Facing a problem with the Scheduled Post in this Theme Unit Test XML
> file.
> >
> > The post is scheduled to be published on 1970, and that is probably why
> this
> > post got published immediately when I imported the XML file in a
> completely
> > new install today.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes, its well organized and informative.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> This. The tests haven't changed; just the organization of the Posts.
> When
> >>> I have some spare time, I'll get the Codex page synchronized.
> >>>
> >>> Hopefully, the tests should be easier to step through, and a bit more
> >>> explicit regarding what we're trying to test.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Edward Caissie
> >>> <edward.caissie at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> The test data may be different and test for additional use cases but
> the
> >>>> guidelines are still the same. Keep in mind you can even use your own
> custom
> >>>> data, the idea behind a "standardized" collection of test posts/pages
> is for
> >>>> easier communication of items that do not meet the guidelines or
> should be
> >>>> addressed for various and sundry other reasons. The WPTRT benchmarks
> are in
> >>>> the guidelines not the test data used to review the theme.
> >>>>
> >>>> Edward Caissie
> >>>> aka Cais.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This test unit is completely different from the old one, Themes
> should
> >>>>> be compliant with this one right away or from sometime later?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Paul Appleyard <paul at spacecat.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So it wasn't just me! Thanks mate.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Paul Appleyard
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 8/05/2013 6:10 AM, Lance Willett wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi reviewers,
> >>>>>>> New version of the Theme Unit Test XML file is ready for use. The
> >>>>>>> previous version had a malformed XML tag that was causing a few
> >>>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>> in the import process.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> http://wordpress.org/support/topic/theme-unit-test-failing?replies=12#post-4171509
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks to Mel (esmi), Jon Cave (duck_) and Kim Dobson for reports
> and
> >>>>>>> helpful info to track it down.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>> Lance
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130511/659e758e/attachment.html>


More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list