[theme-reviewers] Menu Depth

[Daniel Fenn]

I just hope not, going to upset everyone.

On 3/21/13, Justin Tadlock <justin at justintadlock.com> wrote:
> wp_nav_menu() is a template tag, which means it is a function for use
> within theme template files.  It has an argument called "depth".  This
> argument allows theme authors to set a specific depth on the menu that
> they are displaying.
>
> Are we now to start picking and choosing which template tag parameters
> are acceptable for use?
>
> On 3/21/2013 2:34 AM, Emil Uzelac wrote:
>>
>> I will respectfully disagree no need to dictate one level menus.
>>
>> On Mar 21, 2013 1:48 AM, "Justin Tadlock" <justin at justintadlock.com
>> <mailto:justin at justintadlock.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     A single level is fine.  There are no requirements on menu depth.
>>     This is a theme design decision.
>>
>>     Previous discussion:
>>
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/2013-February/011693.html
>>
>>
>>     On 3/20/2013 10:08 PM, Emil Uzelac wrote:
>>>     This would be limiting the Theme, so I would say yes
>>>     there should be more than one level.
>>>
>>>
>>>     On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Stephen Cui <scui2005 at gmail.com
>>>     <mailto:scui2005 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>         I see multiple level there. It means theme required to
>>>         support multiple level. Thanks
>>>
>>>         Stephen
>>>
>>>
>>>         On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me
>>>         <mailto:emil at uzelac.me>> wrote:
>>>
>>>             Please see: http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Unit_Test#Menus
>>>
>>>
>>>             On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Stephen Cui
>>>             <scui2005 at gmail.com <mailto:scui2005 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>                 I am reviewing a theme. Is a theme allowed to display
>>>                 only one level?
>>>
>>>                 wp_nav_menu( array( 'theme_location' =>
>>>                 'primary','depth' => 1 )
>>>
>>>                 regards
>>>
>>>                 Stephen
>>>
>>>                 _______________________________________________
>>>                 theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>                 theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>                 <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>             _______________________________________________
>>>             theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>             theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>             <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>             http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>         theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>         theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>         <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>         http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>     theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>     http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     theme-reviewers mailing list
>>     theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>     <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>     http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Daniel Fenn