[theme-reviewers] Is my theme correctly submitted?

[Agentur Strauß]

Hello @all, for a few Weeks I have submitted The theme named guenterstrauss. Was this theme correctly submitted? Best Regards

Philipp

Von meinem iPhone gesendet

Am 01.03.2013 um 19:36 schrieb Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>:

> That's always been the case, whether or not the non-GPL-compatible Themes/Plugins were distributed via ThemeForest or anywhere else.
> 
> Also, Theme URI should *not* be a TF link. Theme URI cannot be used solely to link to an Upsell Theme. Theme URI, if linked, must be a resource for the free version being hosted in the Directory.
> 
> 
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Merci Javier <mercijavier at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>>> I'm going to go ahead and say that, once the 100% GPL license is available, Theme developers who use that license option for all their ThemeForest-hosted Themes/Plugins would be welcome to advertise those ThemeForest-hosted Themes/Plugins.
>>> 
>>> (Consider that an official statement, unless/until it is superseded by someone above the pay
>> 
>> "all their TF hosted themes/plugins"
>> - So going forward,. if some of the author's themes are not GPL, they cannot use TF theme doc link as Theme URL? 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130301/e68c39b6/attachment-0001.htm>