[theme-reviewers] New Guy Question

[Emil Uzelac]

makes sense :)


On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Amy Hendrix <sabreuse at gmail.com> wrote:

> It looks like version 1 was accidentally left open (and thus still in
> the queue) instead of being closed as it should -- there's no need to
> review an older version than the most recent.
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Aaron Nimocks <aaron_nimocks at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > Reviewing my first theme and I have a question.
> >
> > http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/10451
> >
> > I had to fix header output error and then just peeked at the theme
> options
> > to see that they are non existent / default theme option framework.
>  Which
> > isn't even listed in the description so no clue why that's there.
> >
> > So I looked it up on trac and found a newer version.
> >
> > http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/10577
> >
> > Downloaded and installed and same result as above before I even looking
> at
> > it.
> >
> > Change history said the previous version was reviewed 2 times before and
> > everything was fixed but I don't see any notes. Also there is 3 versions
> and
> > 2.0 is already declined.
> >
> > http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/query?keywords=~theme-reuben
> >
> > So my big question is why would I review this if the next version is
> already
> > declined and is it typical to get submissions like this?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Aaron
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130117/62f28f85/attachment.htm>