[theme-reviewers] Safeguards

[yulian yordanov]

The solution I see it reviews to be done more quickly. We are not 
evaluate diamonds, so it's not necessary a theme to be shiny in all 
angles. Moreover theme development is dynamic process, the authors can 
submit a new version with improvements at any time.
The accent in the review process has to be on the end-user - if a theme 
works with the website content and doesn't do any troubles to the user, 
let it pass. All other remarks are practice for mastery :)

Fingli

On 17.2.2013 19:05, Bryan Hadaway wrote:
> I agree. However, please realize my thoughts follow a generalized 
> stream of thought on the overall issue, not any specific case. I say 
> what's done is done and leave it in the past, but we could use more 
> guideline clarity moving forward to address the issue.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers

-- 
yulian yordanov
post-scriptum.info <http://post-scriptum.info/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130217/5856a244/attachment.htm>