[theme-reviewers] Themes based on other themes

Chip Bennett chip at chipbennett.net
Wed May 30 13:38:48 UTC 2012


One of your later replies to the topic appears to be a reply to a digest.
It's okay; but it just makes it harder to follow the discussion.

Please keep asking questions, though!

Thanks for your contributions,

Chip

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Central Victorian Irish Association <
info at cvia.com.au> wrote:

> Hi Jay,
>
> I did when I opened this topic.
> I am only replying to this topic.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Dan
>
> -----Original Message----- From: theme-reviewers-request at lists.**
> wordpress.org <theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 10:02 PM
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> Subject: theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 24, Issue 82
>
>
> Send theme-reviewers mailing list submissions to
> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> theme-reviewers-request at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org>
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> theme-reviewers-owner at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers-owner at lists.wordpress.org>
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of theme-reviewers digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>  1. Re: Themes based on other themes (jay Cauvain)
>
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**----------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 05:02:27 -0700
> From: jay Cauvain <wp at stormfire.me>
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Themes based on other themes
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> Message-ID:
> <CAPq7n5=MVv6zarAHfp8kTEqNpZdn**HU85J+ttkuiEjRPq5XAo5g at mail.**gmail.com<MVv6zarAHfp8kTEqNpZdnHU85J%2BttkuiEjRPq5XAo5g at mail.gmail.com>
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> Just one more thing Dan, when posting to this list could you please create
> a new email rather then replying to the digests.
> On May 30, 2012 12:54 PM, "Central Victorian Irish Association" <
> info at cvia.com.au> wrote:
>
>  Thanks Jay.
>> That's what I figured alright. Just wanted to make sure. :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Dan
>>
>> -----Original Message----- From: theme-reviewers-request at lists.****
>> wordpress.org <theme-reviewers-request@**lists.wordpress.org<theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org>
>> >
>>
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 9:45 PM
>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpr**ess.org <http://wordpress.org><
>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> >
>>
>> Subject: theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 24, Issue 80
>>
>> Send theme-reviewers mailing list submissions to
>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpr**ess.org <http://wordpress.org><
>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> >
>>
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/****mailman/listinfo/theme-****reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers>
>> <http://lists.**wordpress.org/mailman/**listinfo/theme-reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>> >
>>
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> theme-reviewers-request at lists.****wordpress.org<theme-**
>> reviewers-request at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org>
>> >
>>
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> theme-reviewers-owner at lists.****wordpress.org <http://wordpress.org><
>> theme-reviewers-**owner at lists.wordpress.org<theme-reviewers-owner at lists.wordpress.org>
>> >
>>
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of theme-reviewers digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>  1. Re: Figerty Theme (Central Victorian Irish Association)
>>  2. Twenty Eleven Theme (Tuan Pickard)
>>  3. Themes based on other themes (Central Victorian Irish Association)
>>  4. Re: Twenty Eleven Theme (jay Cauvain)
>>  5. Re: Themes based on other themes (jay Cauvain)
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------****----------------------------**
>> --**----------
>>
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 22:14:51 +1000
>> From: "Central Victorian Irish Association" <info at cvia.com.au>
>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Figerty Theme
>> To: <theme-reviewers at lists.**wordp**ress.org <http://wordpress.org><
>> theme-reviewers@**lists.wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> >
>> >
>> Message-ID: <****8513E15598B14E14AE143B179737E0****93 at DannoLapTop>
>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
>> reply-type=original
>>
>> Hi guys/gals
>>
>> Yeah Doug, I ran it through there. The only issues (if issues at all) it
>> disclosed were Recommendations. Now, anyone who is submitting for the
>> first
>> time would see these as simply Recommendations or Suggestions. I certainly
>> did and when the theme was refused on these grounds, that's when I got
>> frustrated.
>> In saying that, I do apologise for my frustration. I am not usually like
>> that at all. I have since corrected the issues outlined in the review and
>> have resubmitted the theme. It now awaits review. :P
>> I have also joined the WPTRT and have been busy today doing themes because
>> I
>> had an easy day at work. :P
>>
>> I do agree that the Theme Check plugin should be pushed on developers to
>> use
>> before submitting themes. It should be mandatory for them to install the
>> plugin and the test data too and test before submitting.
>>
>> God Bless.
>> Dan (figerty).
>>
>> -----Original Message----- From: theme-reviewers-request at lists.****
>> wordpress.org <theme-reviewers-request@**lists.wordpress.org<theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org>
>> >
>>
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 10:00 PM
>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpr**ess.org <http://wordpress.org><
>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> >
>>
>> Subject: theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 24, Issue 79
>>
>> Send theme-reviewers mailing list submissions to
>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpr**ess.org <http://wordpress.org><
>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> >
>>
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/****mailman/listinfo/theme-****reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers>
>> <http://lists.**wordpress.org/mailman/**listinfo/theme-reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>> >
>>
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> theme-reviewers-request at lists.****wordpress.org<theme-**
>> reviewers-request at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org>
>> >
>>
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> theme-reviewers-owner at lists.****wordpress.org <http://wordpress.org><
>> theme-reviewers-**owner at lists.wordpress.org<theme-reviewers-owner at lists.wordpress.org>
>> >
>>
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of theme-reviewers digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>  1. Re: Figerty Theme (Chip Bennett)
>>  2. Re: Figerty Theme (Doug Stewart)
>>  3. Re: Figerty Theme (jay Cauvain)
>>  4. Re: Figerty Theme (Otto)
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------****----------------------------**
>> --**----------
>>
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 16:36:17 -0500
>> From: Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Figerty Theme
>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpr**ess.org <http://wordpress.org><
>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> >
>> Message-ID:
>> <**CAPdLKqdUAdgNMvtY2UDGXijj1biW****n7aRrkBfCGqQ39NEtcxbWQ at mail.****
>> gmail.com<CAPdLKqdUAdgNMvtY2U**DGXijj1biWn7aRrkBfCGqQ39NEtcxb**
>> WQ at mail.gmail.com<CAPdLKqdUAdgNMvtY2UDGXijj1biWn7aRrkBfCGqQ39NEtcxbWQ at mail.gmail.com>
>> >
>>
>> >
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> There used to be a "resources" section on the Theme Review Codex page, but
>> it has since been moved elsewhere. The Theme Review page is intended to be
>> the Guidelines, and *only* the Guidelines.
>>
>> That said: if you follow through to the Theme Unit
>> Tests<http://codex.wordpress.****org/Theme_Review<http://**
>> codex.wordpress.org/Theme_**Review<http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review>
>> >>Codex
>>
>> page, you'll see a
>> link to How To Join WPTRT:
>>
>> Read How To Join
>> WPTRT<http://make.wordpress.****org/themes/about/how-to-join-****wptrt/<
>> http://make.wordpress.**org/themes/about/how-to-join-**wptrt/<http://make.wordpress.org/themes/about/how-to-join-wptrt/>
>> >
>>
>> >,
>> and follow all test-environment setup instructions
>>
>>
>> The setup instructions on How To Join WPTRT includes a step to install
>> Theme Check. :)
>>
>> Chip
>>
>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Doug Stewart <zamoose at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>  On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Central Victorian Irish Association
>>
>>> <info at cvia.com.au> wrote:
>>> > Well,
>>> > Kind of pointless trying to argue the point isn't it? Especially, from
>>> what
>>> > you tell me, your own theme (twentyten) is not compliant but yet
>>> > released
>>> > with WordPress.
>>> > But never mind, my frustration only comes from my passion to make a
>>> > contribution to Open Source and not towards those who do not have that
>>> > passion.
>>> > I will fix the "Recommended" issues and resubmit it. I won't be holding
>>> my
>>> > breath though.
>>> >
>>> > Have a good day.
>>> > Dan
>>> >
>>>
>>> Dan:
>>> Did you run your theme through the Theme Check plugin by any chance?
>>>
>>> Theme review team:
>>> I note that the submission page and the Codex articles don't seem to
>>> call out the Theme Check plugin as an excellent way to avoid these
>>> sorts of developer frustrations. Is there a particular reason we avoid
>>> pushing this valuable tool so as to save theme devs a few headaches?
>>>
>>> --
>>> -Doug
>>> ______________________________****_________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpr**ess.org <http://wordpress.org><
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>> >
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/****mailman/listinfo/theme-****reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers>
>>> <http://lists.**wordpress.org/mailman/**listinfo/theme-reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>> >
>>>
>>>  -------------- next part --------------
>>>
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> <http://lists.wordpress.org/****pipermail/theme-reviewers/**<http://lists.wordpress.org/**pipermail/theme-reviewers/**>
>> attachments/20120528/edaa240e/****attachment-0001.htm<http://**
>> lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/**theme-reviewers/attachments/**
>> 20120528/edaa240e/attachment-**0001.htm<http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120528/edaa240e/attachment-0001.htm>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 18:52:49 -0400
>> From: Doug Stewart <zamoose at gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Figerty Theme
>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpr**ess.org <http://wordpress.org><
>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> >
>> Message-ID:
>> <CANFh3d43_****Ljiy4tGYucdRKnYNcJTOyJsaNNkz8e****T9VVN=
>> SoKdw at mail.gmail.com>
>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>
>> Right, but not all theme devs think "Oh, I should join TRT" and thus
>> miss out on that info. I think this is one of those cases and thus we
>> ought to think about adding a link, prominently, to the submission
>> process.
>>
>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  There used to be a "resources" section on the Theme Review Codex page,
>>> but
>>> it has since been moved elsewhere. The Theme Review page is intended to
>>> be
>>> the Guidelines, and *only* the Guidelines.
>>>
>>> That said: if you follow through to the Theme Unit Tests Codex page,
>>> you'll
>>> see a link to How To Join WPTRT:
>>>
>>> Read?How To Join WPTRT, and follow all test-environment setup
>>> instructions
>>>
>>>
>>> The setup instructions on How To Join WPTRT includes a step to install
>>> Theme
>>> Check. :)
>>>
>>> Chip
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Doug Stewart <zamoose at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Central Victorian Irish Association
>>>> <info at cvia.com.au> wrote:
>>>> > Well,
>>>> > Kind of pointless trying to argue the point isn't it? Especially, from
>>>> > what
>>>> > you tell me, your own theme (twentyten) is not compliant but yet
>>>> > released
>>>> > with WordPress.
>>>> > But never mind, my frustration only comes from my passion to make a
>>>> > contribution to Open Source and not towards those who do not have that
>>>> > passion.
>>>> > I will fix the "Recommended" issues and resubmit it. I won't be >
>>>> holding
>>>> > my
>>>> > breath though.
>>>> >
>>>> > Have a good day.
>>>> > Dan
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> Dan:
>>>> Did you run your theme through the Theme Check plugin by any chance?
>>>>
>>>> Theme review team:
>>>> I note that the submission page and the Codex articles don't seem to
>>>> call out the Theme Check plugin as an excellent way to avoid these
>>>> sorts of developer frustrations. Is there a particular reason we avoid
>>>> pushing this valuable tool so as to save theme devs a few headaches?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> -Doug
>>>> ______________________________****_________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpr**ess.org <http://wordpress.org><
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>> >
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/****mailman/listinfo/theme-****reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers>
>>>> <http://lists.**wordpress.org/mailman/**listinfo/theme-reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________________****_________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpr**ess.org <http://wordpress.org><
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>> >
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/****mailman/listinfo/theme-****reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers>
>>> <http://lists.**wordpress.org/mailman/**listinfo/theme-reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> -Doug
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 16:01:23 -0700
>> From: jay Cauvain <wp at stormfire.me>
>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Figerty Theme
>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpr**ess.org <http://wordpress.org><
>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> >
>> Message-ID:
>> <CAPq7n5kJESLCaxH-****H50db9BoFnLnNFfZOEtWuEjcE+**x1**
>> XSyAwA at mail.gmail.com <x1XSyAwA at mail.gmail.com><CAPq7n5k**JESLCaxH-**
>> H50db9BoFnLnNFfZOEtWuEjcE%**2Bx1XSyAwA at mail.gmail.com<CAPq7n5kJESLCaxH-H50db9BoFnLnNFfZOEtWuEjcE%252Bx1XSyAwA at mail.gmail.com>
>> >
>>
>> >
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> I think the plugin link should be included in the guidelines themselves,
>> under best practices.
>>
>> Just my 2p
>> On May 28, 2012 11:53 PM, "Doug Stewart" <zamoose at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>  Right, but not all theme devs think "Oh, I should join TRT" and thus
>>
>>> miss out on that info. I think this is one of those cases and thus we
>>> ought to think about adding a link, prominently, to the submission
>>> process.
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>>> wrote:
>>> > There used to be a "resources" section on the Theme Review Codex page,
>>> but
>>> > it has since been moved elsewhere. The Theme Review page is intended to
>>> be
>>> > the Guidelines, and *only* the Guidelines.
>>> >
>>> > That said: if you follow through to the Theme Unit Tests Codex page,
>>> you'll
>>> > see a link to How To Join WPTRT:
>>> >
>>> > Read How To Join WPTRT, and follow all test-environment setup
>>> instructions
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > The setup instructions on How To Join WPTRT includes a step to install
>>> Theme
>>> > Check. :)
>>> >
>>> > Chip
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Doug Stewart <zamoose at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Central Victorian Irish Association
>>> >> <info at cvia.com.au> wrote:
>>> >> > Well,
>>> >> > Kind of pointless trying to argue the point isn't it? Especially,
>>> >> > from
>>> >> > what
>>> >> > you tell me, your own theme (twentyten) is not compliant but yet
>>> >> > released
>>> >> > with WordPress.
>>> >> > But never mind, my frustration only comes from my passion to make a
>>> >> > contribution to Open Source and not towards those who do not have
>>> >> > that
>>> >> > passion.
>>> >> > I will fix the "Recommended" issues and resubmit it. I won't be
>>> holding
>>> >> > my
>>> >> > breath though.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Have a good day.
>>> >> > Dan
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >> Dan:
>>> >> Did you run your theme through the Theme Check plugin by any chance?
>>> >>
>>> >> Theme review team:
>>> >> I note that the submission page and the Codex articles don't seem to
>>> >> call out the Theme Check plugin as an excellent way to avoid these
>>> >> sorts of developer frustrations. Is there a particular reason we avoid
>>> >> pushing this valuable tool so as to save theme devs a few headaches?
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> -Doug
>>> >> ______________________________****_________________
>>> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> >> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpr**ess.org <http://wordpress.org><
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>> >
>>> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/****mailman/listinfo/theme-****reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers>
>>> <http://lists.**wordpress.org/mailman/**listinfo/theme-reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ______________________________****_________________
>>> > theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> > theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpr**ess.org <http://wordpress.org><
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>> >
>>> > http://lists.wordpress.org/****mailman/listinfo/theme-****reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers>
>>> <http://lists.**wordpress.org/mailman/**listinfo/theme-reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -Doug
>>> ______________________________****_________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpr**ess.org <http://wordpress.org><
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>> >
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/****mailman/listinfo/theme-****reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers>
>>> <http://lists.**wordpress.org/mailman/**listinfo/theme-reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>> >
>>>
>>>  -------------- next part --------------
>>>
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> <http://lists.wordpress.org/****pipermail/theme-reviewers/**<http://lists.wordpress.org/**pipermail/theme-reviewers/**>
>> attachments/20120528/99815009/****attachment-0001.htm<http://**
>> lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/**theme-reviewers/attachments/**
>> 20120528/99815009/attachment-**0001.htm<http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120528/99815009/attachment-0001.htm>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 4
>> Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 18:01:40 -0500
>> From: Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com>
>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Figerty Theme
>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpr**ess.org <http://wordpress.org><
>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> >
>> Message-ID:
>> <CAD-FghzpRAf_****QSB28mSr38qyziR2+****zpCdqgsMKYhZR1XEh-99A at mail.**g**
>> mail.com <http://gmail.com><CAD-FghzpRAf_**QSB28mSr38qyziR2%**
>> 2BzpCdqgsMKYhZR1XEh-99A at mail.**gmail.com<CAD-FghzpRAf_QSB28mSr38qyziR2%252BzpCdqgsMKYhZR1XEh-99A at mail.gmail.com>
>> >
>>
>> >
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>
>> I think it would be useful for the header section of
>> http://codex.wordpress.org/****Theme_Review<http://codex.wordpress.org/**Theme_Review>
>> <http://codex.**wordpress.org/Theme_Review<http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review>>to
>> at least have a link to
>>
>> some other page that lists resources/tools/other links for theme
>> authors to take note of. Don't need a resources section on that page
>> itself, but if there's another page with that info, linking to it
>> would be nice.
>>
>> -Otto
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  There used to be a "resources" section on the Theme Review Codex page,
>>> but
>>> it has since been moved elsewhere. The Theme Review page is intended to
>>> be
>>> the Guidelines, and *only* the Guidelines.
>>>
>>> That said: if you follow through to the Theme Unit Tests Codex page,
>>> you'll
>>> see a link to How To Join WPTRT:
>>>
>>> Read?How To Join WPTRT, and follow all test-environment setup
>>> instructions
>>>
>>>
>>> The setup instructions on How To Join WPTRT includes a step to install
>>> Theme
>>> Check. :)
>>>
>>> Chip
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Doug Stewart <zamoose at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Central Victorian Irish Association
>>>> <info at cvia.com.au> wrote:
>>>> > Well,
>>>> > Kind of pointless trying to argue the point isn't it? Especially, from
>>>> > what
>>>> > you tell me, your own theme (twentyten) is not compliant but yet
>>>> > released
>>>> > with WordPress.
>>>> > But never mind, my frustration only comes from my passion to make a
>>>> > contribution to Open Source and not towards those who do not have that
>>>> > passion.
>>>> > I will fix the "Recommended" issues and resubmit it. I won't be >
>>>> holding
>>>> > my
>>>> > breath though.
>>>> >
>>>> > Have a good day.
>>>> > Dan
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> Dan:
>>>> Did you run your theme through the Theme Check plugin by any chance?
>>>>
>>>> Theme review team:
>>>> I note that the submission page and the Codex articles don't seem to
>>>> call out the Theme Check plugin as an excellent way to avoid these
>>>> sorts of developer frustrations. Is there a particular reason we avoid
>>>> pushing this valuable tool so as to save theme devs a few headaches?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> -Doug
>>>> ______________________________****_________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpr**ess.org <http://wordpress.org><
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>> >
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/****mailman/listinfo/theme-****reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers>
>>>> <http://lists.**wordpress.org/mailman/**listinfo/theme-reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________________****_________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpr**ess.org <http://wordpress.org><
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>> >
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/****mailman/listinfo/theme-****reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers>
>>> <http://lists.**wordpress.org/mailman/**listinfo/theme-reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> ______________________________****_________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpr**ess.org <http://wordpress.org><
>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> >
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/****mailman/listinfo/theme-****reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers>
>> <http://lists.**wordpress.org/mailman/**listinfo/theme-reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> End of theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 24, Issue 79
>> ***************************************************
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 11:49:55 +0200
>> From: Tuan Pickard <tuanpickard at gmail.com>
>> Subject: [theme-reviewers] Twenty Eleven Theme
>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpr**ess.org <http://wordpress.org><
>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> >
>> Message-ID:
>> <CA+NmhzY=**6rEERaMF9LQ7Fdoi5O1s**Pb5Wwpe+**A4j-Bkn4-UgjFg at mail.**gmail.*
>> *com <http://gmail.com><6rEERaMF9LQ7Fdoi5O1sPb5Wwp**
>> e%2BA4j-Bkn4-UgjFg at mail.gmail.**com<6rEERaMF9LQ7Fdoi5O1sPb5Wwpe%252BA4j-Bkn4-UgjFg at mail.gmail.com>
>> >
>>
>> >
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> Hi There,
>>
>> I am using WordPress 3.3.2 and have installed the WordPress Twenty Eleven
>> theme. I have been playing around with the Custom Header options and have
>> loaded seven of them, I cannot load any more and assume that seven is the
>> limit, how do I delete them? Removing the Header Image doesn't seem to
>> work. Or should I simply reload WordPress?
>>
>> Thanks and regards,
>>
>> Tuan Pickard
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/****pipermail/theme-reviewers/**<http://lists.wordpress.org/**pipermail/theme-reviewers/**>
>> attachments/20120530/d24d0ec3/****attachment-0001.htm<http://**
>> lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/**theme-reviewers/attachments/**
>> 20120530/d24d0ec3/attachment-**0001.htm<http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120530/d24d0ec3/attachment-0001.htm>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 21:03:23 +1000
>> From: "Central Victorian Irish Association" <info at cvia.com.au>
>> Subject: [theme-reviewers] Themes based on other themes
>> To: <theme-reviewers at lists.**wordp**ress.org <http://wordpress.org><
>> theme-reviewers@**lists.wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> >
>> >
>> Message-ID: <****7D5FC8687DAE4F39A747000DE8FEEF****79 at DannoLapTop>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> Good morning/evening/afternoon/****night/chtistmas etc.
>>
>> Just a question.
>> I am reviewing a theme at the moment that is evidently based on TwentyTen
>> and I have run it through the Theme Check. Everything seems fine except it
>> indicates on every single file that TwentyTen Text Domain is being used.
>> Is this allowed or should it be declined on this? I am under the
>> impression that if a theme is based on TwentyTen, or any theme at that,
>> that it is no longer TwentyTen and should contain no mention of it.
>> Your feedback oh great masters of WordPressing is appreciated.
>> Cheers,
>> Dan
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/****pipermail/theme-reviewers/**<http://lists.wordpress.org/**pipermail/theme-reviewers/**>
>> attachments/20120530/6e8d4266/****attachment-0001.htm<http://**
>> lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/**theme-reviewers/attachments/**
>> 20120530/6e8d4266/attachment-**0001.htm<http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120530/6e8d4266/attachment-0001.htm>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 4
>> Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 04:43:27 -0700
>> From: jay Cauvain <wp at stormfire.me>
>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Twenty Eleven Theme
>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpr**ess.org <http://wordpress.org><
>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> >
>> Message-ID:
>> <CAPq7n5kEoj5-****9pmGB3M0hEfrJ3TNoMNUGRXx4ii2UY****
>> KouSadeA at mail.gmail.com<CAPq**7n5kEoj5-**9pmGB3M0hEfrJ3TNoMNUGRXx4ii2UY**
>> KouSadeA at mail.gmail.com<CAPq7n5kEoj5-9pmGB3M0hEfrJ3TNoMNUGRXx4ii2UYKouSadeA at mail.gmail.com>
>> >
>>
>> >
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> please asks support questions in the support forums, the list is not
>> intended for that purpose.
>> On May 30, 2012 10:50 AM, "Tuan Pickard" <tuanpickard at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>  Hi There,
>>
>>>
>>>  I am using WordPress 3.3.2 and have installed the WordPress Twenty
>>> Eleven theme. I have been playing around with the Custom Header options
>>> and
>>> have loaded seven of them, I cannot load any more and assume that seven
>>> is
>>> the limit, how do I delete them? Removing the Header Image doesn't seem
>>> to
>>> work. Or should I simply reload WordPress?
>>>
>>> Thanks and regards,
>>>
>>> Tuan Pickard
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________________****_________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpr**ess.org <http://wordpress.org><
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>> >
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/****mailman/listinfo/theme-****reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers>
>>> <http://lists.**wordpress.org/mailman/**listinfo/theme-reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>  -------------- next part --------------
>>>
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/****pipermail/theme-reviewers/**<http://lists.wordpress.org/**pipermail/theme-reviewers/**>
>> attachments/20120530/ca3cfd9c/****attachment-0001.htm<http://**
>> lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/**theme-reviewers/attachments/**
>> 20120530/ca3cfd9c/attachment-**0001.htm<http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120530/ca3cfd9c/attachment-0001.htm>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 5
>> Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 04:45:06 -0700
>> From: jay Cauvain <wp at stormfire.me>
>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Themes based on other themes
>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpr**ess.org <http://wordpress.org><
>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> >
>> Message-ID:
>> <**CAPq7n5mre0AJb7HaihGbzoqbyuCJ****APxY8rUfJ5O8kBOnKP9Kdg at mail.****
>> gmail.com<CAPq7n5mre0AJb7Haih**GbzoqbyuCJAPxY8rUfJ5O8kBOnKP9K**
>> dg at mail.gmail.com<CAPq7n5mre0AJb7HaihGbzoqbyuCJAPxY8rUfJ5O8kBOnKP9Kdg at mail.gmail.com>
>> >
>>
>> >
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> The theme needs to be rejected, and all instances of the text domain need
>> to be changed.
>> On May 30, 2012 12:03 PM, "Central Victorian Irish Association" <
>> info at cvia.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>  Good morning/evening/afternoon/****night/chtistmas etc.
>>
>>>  Just a question.
>>> I am reviewing a theme at the moment that is evidently based on TwentyTen
>>> and I have run it through the Theme Check. Everything seems fine except
>>> it
>>> indicates on every single file that TwentyTen Text Domain is being used.
>>> Is this allowed or should it be declined on this? I am under the
>>> impression that if a theme is based on TwentyTen, or any theme at that,
>>> that it is no longer TwentyTen and should contain no mention of it.
>>>  Your feedback oh great masters of WordPressing is appreciated. [image:
>>> Smile]
>>>  Cheers,
>>> Dan
>>>
>>> ______________________________****_________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpr**ess.org <http://wordpress.org><
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>> >
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/****mailman/listinfo/theme-****reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers>
>>> <http://lists.**wordpress.org/mailman/**listinfo/theme-reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>  -------------- next part --------------
>>>
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/****pipermail/theme-reviewers/**<http://lists.wordpress.org/**pipermail/theme-reviewers/**>
>> attachments/20120530/3674d204/****attachment.htm<http://lists.**
>> wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-**reviewers/attachments/**
>> 20120530/3674d204/attachment.**htm<http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120530/3674d204/attachment.htm>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> ______________________________****_________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpr**ess.org <http://wordpress.org><
>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> >
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/****mailman/listinfo/theme-****reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers>
>> <http://lists.**wordpress.org/mailman/**listinfo/theme-reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> End of theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 24, Issue 80
>> ***************************************************
>> ______________________________****_________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpr**ess.org <http://wordpress.org><
>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> >
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/****mailman/listinfo/theme-****reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers>
>> <http://lists.**wordpress.org/mailman/**listinfo/theme-reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>> >
>>
>>  -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/**pipermail/theme-reviewers/**
> attachments/20120530/62d84f12/**attachment.htm<http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120530/62d84f12/attachment.htm>
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>
>
> End of theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 24, Issue 82
>
> *************************************************
> ______________________________**_________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120530/7f95b4cf/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list