[theme-reviewers] Ang.: Current Theme Unit Test Data

Emil Uzelac emil at themeid.com
Thu Jul 19 01:04:08 UTC 2012


And maybe
http://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/media-queries-for-standard-devices/ to
standard devices.

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com> wrote:

> Actually I lied and taking the last message back, please see:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-css3-mediaqueries-20120619/ that part is
> now standardized :)
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com> wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately there's no standard for "breakpoints" they're
>> Design/Theme-Specific.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Emil
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:51 PM, myazalea at hotmail.com <
>> myazalea at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> **
>>> With the amount of users, who better to set the standard than WordPress,
>>> if we can only come up with and agree on some minimums.
>>>
>>>
>>> Maybe decide on some standard breakpoints and have the theme check
>>> plugin to check if they exist in the css.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Skickat från min HTC
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Reply message -----
>>> Från: "Emil Uzelac" <emil at themeid.com>
>>> Till: <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>> Rubrik: [theme-reviewers] Current Theme Unit Test Data
>>> Datum: tors, jul 19, 2012 02:21
>>>
>>>
>>> And again this is a never-ending conversation, since there's not really
>>> any standards as far as the Responsive Web Design :)
>>>
>>>
>>> Emil
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Daniel Tara <contact at onedesigns.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> What I mean to say is that the main layout adaptations should not rely
>>>> entirely on JavaScript. Using it as fallback, to prettify traditions or
>>>> where there's no other alternative should be fine.
>>>>
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 19, 2012, at 2:05 AM, Emil Uzelac wrote:
>>>>
>>>> *"Design responsiveness should not be JavaScript dependent"*
>>>>
>>>> IE8 and bellow do not support CSS3 media queries, so JS is very much
>>>> needed :) please see: https://github.com/scottjehl/Respond/ I'm using
>>>> that in my Theme and many others out there.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Emil
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Daniel Tara <contact at onedesigns.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The only guidelines I would recommend regarding responsive design are:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    - No content should be hidden, ever, that's (very) bad practice.
>>>>>    - Images should constrain proportions.
>>>>>    - Design responsiveness should not be JavaScript dependent
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Everything else would mean restraining the developer. IMHO.
>>>>>
>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 19, 2012, at 1:10 AM, Emil Uzelac wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Bruce,
>>>>>
>>>>> This is all good and we appreciate the heads-up, however at this
>>>>> moment I would not require Theme Reviewers to test RWD.
>>>>>
>>>>> Think of it like this. If developers says that their Theme is HTML5,
>>>>> none of us will actually go and check just to see if every Theme element is
>>>>> HTML5 and/or if developers decided to "hack" with non-HTML5 techniques.
>>>>> As Chip said once this will be under the description and that's all
>>>>> for right now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just for FYI purpose only all this and much more is under my Theme
>>>>> http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/responsive, feel free to browse
>>>>> around if you need. Autohide or shrink of sidebars is not the best
>>>>> practices, I would always prefer to "stack" -vs hide.
>>>>>
>>>>> Few sites to consider:
>>>>>
>>>>>    - http://foundation.zurb.com/ (my personal favorite)
>>>>>    - http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/ (second favorite)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Emil
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Bruce Wampler <weavertheme at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry a bit slow with this - Chip asked for some ideas about
>>>>>> responsive theme tests or guidelines. Here are some of the issues I believe
>>>>>> to be important:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. Sidebars - sidebars should nicely shrink with the rest of the page
>>>>>> - things should stay proportional. At some point (maybe at about 480, maybe
>>>>>> even below 600), the sidebar should autohide or everything gets too
>>>>>> squished. I think this kind of behavior should be at the least RECOMMENDED
>>>>>> for responsive themes, if not required.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One of the problems testing this behavior is that not all browsers
>>>>>> respond to responsive div hiding - they need a manual refresh at each new
>>>>>> width.. The content will shrink fine, but the responsive hides don't always
>>>>>> auto-show.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. Images - images need to shrink as the screen does. This includes
>>>>>> the header image.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 3. Menus - menus need to resize nicely. This isn't always easy to do,
>>>>>> and it is not uncommon to get a mess of unreadable, unusable stacked menu
>>>>>> items.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 4. Possibly unhide or move special areas as the width shrinks.
>>>>>> Sidebars might switch from the side to the bottom, for example.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 5. Video media - Video should either dynamically shrink with the
>>>>>> screen (not easy), or at worst hide the overflow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 6. Same for iFrames.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 7. Titles - titles should ideally shrink and wrap, not overwrite
>>>>>> surrounding content. Actually, same for all content. The content should
>>>>>> shrink or re-wrap, and not overwrite surrounding content or sidebars.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 8. If themes have special handling for some devices (iOS or Android),
>>>>>> it should be noted, but it is probably unrealistic to expect testers to
>>>>>> have those devices to test on. Don't know how such things can be tested.
>>>>>> Maybe if there are reviewers with access to such devices, they could have
>>>>>> priority for testing such features. Don't know how many themes include that
>>>>>> kind of support yet, but I imagine it will become more common. It might be
>>>>>> interesting to discuss as recommends to use the existing iOS features that
>>>>>> are available with the WP admin side. (I know they are there, but
>>>>>> unfortunately don't really know if they can easily be used by themes. Seems
>>>>>> like a good opportunity.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, Opera has a mobile device simulator that could be of some use
>>>>>> for testers of responsive themes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bruce Wampler
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120718/c4fda34c/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list