[theme-reviewers] theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 20, Issue 60

Nitin Reddy k_nitin_r at yahoo.co.in
Fri Jan 27 15:16:36 UTC 2012 

Chandra Maharzan,

It is not only the theme authors but also the theme reviewers who get discouraged at times. I reviewed the theme listed on my first ticket and should have been able to assign myself to another ticket (new version of the theme). However, there was a problem with my Trac account and I'm not able to assign the ticket for the new (fixed) version of the theme to myself or close the original ticket so both the theme author and I are looking at our spent efforts yielding no fruit for the community.

I did try posting to the mailing list and contact some of the folks associated with the WP theme repository, but I didn't get any help yet. At this point, Emil sees my user account listed as a theme reviewer account (or something along those lines), my account doesn't let me assign the ticket to myself or close the old ticket, and the theme author is awaiting the approval after having made the fixes to his/her theme.

The problem is not about volunteers lacking dedication - many, if not most, are dedicated to helping out the community. The problem is about not being able to help the volunteers when the process or system (Trac, in my case) breaks down. I can review at least 3 themes a week. That works out to about 14 themes in a month. With 10 volunteers, we can have 140 themes reviewed in a month!


Regards,
Nitin Reddy


________________________________
 From: "theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org" <theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org>
To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org 
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 8:11 PM
Subject: theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 20, Issue 60
 
Send theme-reviewers mailing list submissions to
    theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
    theme-reviewers-owner at lists.wordpress.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of theme-reviewers digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: splitting reviewers between queues (Chandra Maharzan)
   2. Re: splitting reviewers between queues (Simon Prosser)
   3. Re: splitting reviewers between queues
      (Rankin, Matthew W. (Student))


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:26:31 +0545
From: Chandra Maharzan <maharzan at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] splitting reviewers between queues
To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
Message-ID:
    <CABNJqLf9Zx12t+VSH2TkQ5NJMko2sPvR0VR2O+iyLx92F9GYzA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I haven't reviewed any themes but I do think  this volunteer thing
might need to go at some point. Have a dedicated team who reviews
themes and they get incentives on each theme or something. Otherwise
like a person said above, people are discouraged. I was when I
submitted a theme about a year ago and it was reviewed in a long time
and the same thing is happening now. And I have 2 themes in the repo,
pretty popular ones. I am sure many designers feel like me.

On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Phenomenoodle | Taryn Wallis
<taryn at phenomenoodle.com> wrote:
> Up until about 5 years ago (when I transitioned into web design full-time) I
> was an Organizational Psychologist - things like badges work well as a
> motivational tool for some types of people, and absolutely not for others.
> I'm one of the others :)
>
> If there was a badge, I might consider putting it on my site, but it would
> have zero impact from an incentive point of view. I'm far more internally
> motivated, so external things like badges (or certificates etc) have no real
> meaning to me. In terms of theme reviews, I contribute because it allows me
> to give back to the community and to also learn from the experience - if I'm
> not able to do reviews, it's not because of lack of motivation, but simply a
> lack of time :(
>
> ______________________________
> Taryn Wallis
> Phenomenoodle
> WordPress design & development
> www.phenomenoodle.com
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Netzberufler <netzberufler at googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I find Badges are a great idea. They should also be included into the
>> WordPress Profile Pages. http://profiles.wordpress.org/users/ or
>> http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/profile/ . BTW why are there different
>> profile pages on wordpress.org?
>>
>> I currently don't review themes cause of my exams but I will begin
>> reviewing again in 2 weeks ;)
>>
>> 2012/1/26 Rankin, Matthew W. (Student) <mrankin at my.ccsu.edu>
>>
>>> Not directly related to this email thread but seems like a good place to
>>> post it. I was thinking about why there aren't more volunteer reviewers and
>>> why many are slow to review themes. I think it may be because it lacks
>>> incentive. So, I had an idea which may attract more reviewers and increase
>>> productivity among current reviewers. My idea is to create a WordPress
>>> badge. Theme reviewers can post this badge on their own websites to say that
>>> they contribute to WordPress. You could even create different levels of
>>> badges so as you review more themes you get higher level badges. It's a
>>> simple idea which has proven effective on many websites around the web. What
>>> does everyone else think of this idea?
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org
>>> [theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org] on behalf of Rankin, Matthew
>>> W. (Student) [mrankin at my.ccsu.edu]
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 12:49 PM
>>>
>>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] splitting reviewers between queues
>>>
>>> I'll do my best to follow your lead Chip. I've just been so busy lately I
>>> haven't had time to do many reviews. But I should be able to fit in one
>>> theme a day.
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org
>>> [theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org] on behalf of Chip Bennett
>>> [chip at chipbennett.net]
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 12:31 PM
>>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] splitting reviewers between queues
>>>
>>> I don't think a paradigm shift is necessary (or helpful) at this point.
>>>
>>> The bottom line is: about 10 tickets per day are submitted. Thus, we need
>>> about 10 tickets per day reviewed and closed, in order to keep up with the
>>> submission rate. We are approaching 100 people who have reviewed Themes. If
>>> every person with ticket privileges reviewed two tickets, we would exhaust
>>> the current queue entirely.
>>>
>>> I've tried to push in the past to get reviewers to consider committing to
>>> a certain minimum level of participation, but as you've noted: it's not
>>> practical. We ARE all volunteers, and all have extremely busy schedules. (I
>>> last saw a "40-hour work week" sometime last summer.) Efforts to get such
>>> commitments inevitably have the opposite effect, as IMX they have only
>>> driven volunteers AWAY from contributing their time.
>>>
>>> That said: I'll do my best to lead by example. I will commit to reviewing
>>> one Theme per day, every day.
>>>
>>> Chip
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Edward Caissie
>>> <edward.caissie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Although it shouldn't need to be written, but once again it appears a
>>>> reminder appears to be needed ...
>>>>
>>>> To the best of my knowledge, every member of the current Theme Review
>>>> Team is a volunteer. Every member also has a "full work load" with many
>>>> simply unable to devote any time to this volunteer activity during that
>>>> scheduled time. Many of the volunteers have other additional WordPress
>>>> related activities that add to their typical "40-hour week" work load. We
>>>> all have lives, too ... so, quite simply, we give what time we can and look
>>>> to the community to contribute some of their time. Wait times, as noted many
>>>> times, are inversely proportional to the amount of volunteer reviewers
>>>> available to do the work.
>>>>
>>>> We can appreciate the wait time is long and frustrating. This is not the
>>>> only time this topic has been discussed, these are not the only ideas that
>>>> have been considered. Unfortunately until their is perhaps a paradigm shift
>>>> in regards to the WPTRT we may simply be forced to continue to endure and
>>>> forge ahead under these conditions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cais.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Bruce Wampler <weavertheme at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to add my perspective on the review process.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been submitting one theme - with revisions and slight name
>>>>> modifications - for almost two years now - starting with 2010 Weaver,
>>>>> changed to simply Weaver, and now Weaver II.
>>>>>
>>>>> Because Weaver II is a name change, and represents a total rewrite of
>>>>> Weaver, it has been in the Priority Queue for almost 3 months now. I've just
>>>>> been sitting here waiting my turn.
>>>>>
>>>>> But seriously - three months for new themes? The past week, the review
>>>>> rate has been only one new theme reviewed.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is important to keep existing themes up to date - but to essentially
>>>>> have the new theme approval rate one a week will do nothing to encourage
>>>>> authors to submit new themes.
>>>>>
>>>>> I had good reasons to change from Weaver to Weaver II, and perhaps
>>>>> should have requested it be treated as a revision of the existing approved
>>>>> theme. But I don know if I knew three months ago, that I likely would have
>>>>> done things differently, including the possibility of simply abandoning the
>>>>> WP theme repository.
>>>>>
>>>>> But Weaver II represents a cutting edge theme/framework that has (or
>>>>> had three months ago) really new features, including what I think is likely
>>>>> the best mobile support of any WP theme. It is really frustrating to see it
>>>>> languish in the queue.
>>>>>
>>>>> I just think a almost three month wait is excessive, and will seriously
>>>>> discourage developers from developing and submitting new themes.
>>>>>
>>>>> The discussion of new 3.4 features seems almost silly since if the new
>>>>> queue theme stays at several months, it is likely that there won't be any
>>>>> new themes.
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe is really important to keep fresh, new themes with cutting
>>>>> edge features coming in for the future health of WordPress.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just some thoughts. I believe something needs to be done. I'd volunteer
>>>>> to review some themes, but I have serious ethical concerns about that, as
>>>>> well as a full work load supporting my theme which has become very popular
>>>>> on its own while waiting on the queue.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bruce Wampler
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>



-- 
cmans


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:09:37 +0000
From: Simon Prosser <pross at pross.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] splitting reviewers between queues
To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
Message-ID:
    <CAKwUDf0hydH4Pzj2gQ3Yq6o+TTo_Rk0eWnVjPSXKD1C9Wz0oNg at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

What incentives? wordpress.org is a free organization and the theme
team volunteer the time to review themes in their spare time.
They all have regular jobs and lives as well.

On 27 January 2012 13:41, Chandra Maharzan <maharzan at gmail.com> wrote:
> I haven't reviewed any themes but I do think ?this volunteer thing
> might need to go at some point. Have a dedicated team who reviews
> themes and they get incentives on each theme or something. Otherwise
> like a person said above, people are discouraged. I was when I
> submitted a theme about a year ago and it was reviewed in a long time
> and the same thing is happening now. And I have 2 themes in the repo,
> pretty popular ones. I am sure many designers feel like me.
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Phenomenoodle | Taryn Wallis
> <taryn at phenomenoodle.com> wrote:
>> Up until about 5 years ago (when I transitioned into web design full-time) I
>> was an Organizational Psychologist - things like badges work well as a
>> motivational tool for some types of people, and absolutely not for others.
>> I'm one of the others :)
>>
>> If there was a badge, I might consider putting it on my site, but it would
>> have zero impact from an incentive point of view. I'm far more internally
>> motivated, so external things like badges (or certificates etc) have no real
>> meaning to me. In terms of theme reviews, I contribute because it allows me
>> to give back to the community and to also learn from the experience - if I'm
>> not able to do reviews, it's not because of lack of motivation, but simply a
>> lack of time :(
>>
>> ______________________________
>> Taryn Wallis
>> Phenomenoodle
>> WordPress design & development
>> www.phenomenoodle.com
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Netzberufler <netzberufler at googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I find Badges are a great idea. They should also be included into the
>>> WordPress Profile Pages. http://profiles.wordpress.org/users/ or
>>> http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/profile/ . BTW why are there different
>>> profile pages on wordpress.org?
>>>
>>> I currently don't review themes cause of my exams but I will begin
>>> reviewing again in 2 weeks ;)
>>>
>>> 2012/1/26 Rankin, Matthew W. (Student) <mrankin at my.ccsu.edu>
>>>
>>>> Not directly related to this email thread but seems like a good place to
>>>> post it. I was thinking about why there aren't more volunteer reviewers and
>>>> why many are slow to review themes. I think it may be because it lacks
>>>> incentive. So, I had an idea which may attract more reviewers and increase
>>>> productivity among current reviewers. My idea is to create a WordPress
>>>> badge. Theme reviewers can post this badge on their own websites to say that
>>>> they contribute to WordPress. You could even create different levels of
>>>> badges so as you review more themes you get higher level badges. It's a
>>>> simple idea which has proven effective on many websites around the web. What
>>>> does everyone else think of this idea?
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> From: theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> [theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org] on behalf of Rankin, Matthew
>>>> W. (Student) [mrankin at my.ccsu.edu]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 12:49 PM
>>>>
>>>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] splitting reviewers between queues
>>>>
>>>> I'll do my best to follow your lead Chip. I've just been so busy lately I
>>>> haven't had time to do many reviews. But I should be able to fit in one
>>>> theme a day.
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> From: theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> [theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org] on behalf of Chip Bennett
>>>> [chip at chipbennett.net]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 12:31 PM
>>>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] splitting reviewers between queues
>>>>
>>>> I don't think a paradigm shift is necessary (or helpful) at this point.
>>>>
>>>> The bottom line is: about 10 tickets per day are submitted. Thus, we need
>>>> about 10 tickets per day reviewed and closed, in order to keep up with the
>>>> submission rate. We are approaching 100 people who have reviewed Themes. If
>>>> every person with ticket privileges reviewed two tickets, we would exhaust
>>>> the current queue entirely.
>>>>
>>>> I've tried to push in the past to get reviewers to consider committing to
>>>> a certain minimum level of participation, but as you've noted: it's not
>>>> practical. We ARE all volunteers, and all have extremely busy schedules. (I
>>>> last saw a "40-hour work week" sometime last summer.) Efforts to get such
>>>> commitments inevitably have the opposite effect, as IMX they have only
>>>> driven volunteers AWAY from contributing their time.
>>>>
>>>> That said: I'll do my best to lead by example. I will commit to reviewing
>>>> one Theme per day, every day.
>>>>
>>>> Chip
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Edward Caissie
>>>> <edward.caissie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Although it shouldn't need to be written, but once again it appears a
>>>>> reminder appears to be needed ...
>>>>>
>>>>> To the best of my knowledge, every member of the current Theme Review
>>>>> Team is a volunteer. Every member also has a "full work load" with many
>>>>> simply unable to devote any time to this volunteer activity during that
>>>>> scheduled time. Many of the volunteers have other additional WordPress
>>>>> related activities that add to their typical "40-hour week" work load. We
>>>>> all have lives, too ... so, quite simply, we give what time we can and look
>>>>> to the community to contribute some of their time. Wait times, as noted many
>>>>> times, are inversely proportional to the amount of volunteer reviewers
>>>>> available to do the work.
>>>>>
>>>>> We can appreciate the wait time is long and frustrating. This is not the
>>>>> only time this topic has been discussed, these are not the only ideas that
>>>>> have been considered. Unfortunately until their is perhaps a paradigm shift
>>>>> in regards to the WPTRT we may simply be forced to continue to endure and
>>>>> forge ahead under these conditions.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cais.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Bruce Wampler <weavertheme at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to add my perspective on the review process.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have been submitting one theme - with revisions and slight name
>>>>>> modifications - for almost two years now - starting with 2010 Weaver,
>>>>>> changed to simply Weaver, and now Weaver II.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because Weaver II is a name change, and represents a total rewrite of
>>>>>> Weaver, it has been in the Priority Queue for almost 3 months now. I've just
>>>>>> been sitting here waiting my turn.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But seriously - three months for new themes? The past week, the review
>>>>>> rate has been only one new theme reviewed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is important to keep existing themes up to date - but to essentially
>>>>>> have the new theme approval rate one a week will do nothing to encourage
>>>>>> authors to submit new themes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I had good reasons to change from Weaver to Weaver II, and perhaps
>>>>>> should have requested it be treated as a revision of the existing approved
>>>>>> theme. But I don know if I knew three months ago, that I likely would have
>>>>>> done things differently, including the possibility of simply abandoning the
>>>>>> WP theme repository.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But Weaver II represents a cutting edge theme/framework that has (or
>>>>>> had three months ago) really new features, including what I think is likely
>>>>>> the best mobile support of any WP theme. It is really frustrating to see it
>>>>>> languish in the queue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just think a almost three month wait is excessive, and will seriously
>>>>>> discourage developers from developing and submitting new themes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The discussion of new 3.4 features seems almost silly since if the new
>>>>>> queue theme stays at several months, it is likely that there won't be any
>>>>>> new themes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe is really important to keep fresh, new themes with cutting
>>>>>> edge features coming in for the future health of WordPress.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just some thoughts. I believe something needs to be done. I'd volunteer
>>>>>> to review some themes, but I have serious ethical concerns about that, as
>>>>>> well as a full work load supporting my theme which has become very popular
>>>>>> on its own while waiting on the queue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bruce Wampler
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>
>
>
> --
> cmans
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers



-- 
My Blog: http://pross.org.uk/
Plugins : http://pross.org.uk/plugins/
Themes: http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/profile/pross


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:41:05 +0000
From: "Rankin, Matthew W. (Student)" <mrankin at my.ccsu.edu>
Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] splitting reviewers between queues
To: "theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org"
    <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
Message-ID:
    <0A61E76883F4624AAE4D8DF33EB9FF7A09E03756 at CH1PRD0102MB148.prod.exchangelabs.com>
    
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

There are many people ( myself included ) who review themes just for the satisfaction of helping out WordPress. However, there are many people out there who need a little more than that to review themes. Even just a thank you and a WordPress badge to post up on their site would go a long way in attracting more theme reviewers and getting more production out of less active reviewers. The idea is fairly straight forward and easy to implement, and has a proven record of success as you can see by looking at many other websites around the web who use similar ideas. 
________________________________________
From: theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org [theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org] on behalf of Simon Prosser [pross at pross.org.uk]
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 9:09 AM
To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] splitting reviewers between queues

What incentives? wordpress.org is a free organization and the theme
team volunteer the time to review themes in their spare time.
They all have regular jobs and lives as well.

On 27 January 2012 13:41, Chandra Maharzan <maharzan at gmail.com> wrote:
> I haven't reviewed any themes but I do think  this volunteer thing
> might need to go at some point. Have a dedicated team who reviews
> themes and they get incentives on each theme or something. Otherwise
> like a person said above, people are discouraged. I was when I
> submitted a theme about a year ago and it was reviewed in a long time
> and the same thing is happening now. And I have 2 themes in the repo,
> pretty popular ones. I am sure many designers feel like me.
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Phenomenoodle | Taryn Wallis
> <taryn at phenomenoodle.com> wrote:
>> Up until about 5 years ago (when I transitioned into web design full-time) I
>> was an Organizational Psychologist - things like badges work well as a
>> motivational tool for some types of people, and absolutely not for others.
>> I'm one of the others :)
>>
>> If there was a badge, I might consider putting it on my site, but it would
>> have zero impact from an incentive point of view. I'm far more internally
>> motivated, so external things like badges (or certificates etc) have no real
>> meaning to me. In terms of theme reviews, I contribute because it allows me
>> to give back to the community and to also learn from the experience - if I'm
>> not able to do reviews, it's not because of lack of motivation, but simply a
>> lack of time :(
>>
>> ______________________________
>> Taryn Wallis
>> Phenomenoodle
>> WordPress design & development
>> www.phenomenoodle.com
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Netzberufler <netzberufler at googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I find Badges are a great idea. They should also be included into the
>>> WordPress Profile Pages. http://profiles.wordpress.org/users/ or
>>> http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/profile/ . BTW why are there different
>>> profile pages on wordpress.org?
>>>
>>> I currently don't review themes cause of my exams but I will begin
>>> reviewing again in 2 weeks ;)
>>>
>>> 2012/1/26 Rankin, Matthew W. (Student) <mrankin at my.ccsu.edu>
>>>
>>>> Not directly related to this email thread but seems like a good place to
>>>> post it. I was thinking about why there aren't more volunteer reviewers and
>>>> why many are slow to review themes. I think it may be because it lacks
>>>> incentive. So, I had an idea which may attract more reviewers and increase
>>>> productivity among current reviewers. My idea is to create a WordPress
>>>> badge. Theme reviewers can post this badge on their own websites to say that
>>>> they contribute to WordPress. You could even create different levels of
>>>> badges so as you review more themes you get higher level badges. It's a
>>>> simple idea which has proven effective on many websites around the web. What
>>>> does everyone else think of this idea?
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> From: theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> [theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org] on behalf of Rankin, Matthew
>>>> W. (Student) [mrankin at my.ccsu.edu]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 12:49 PM
>>>>
>>>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] splitting reviewers between queues
>>>>
>>>> I'll do my best to follow your lead Chip. I've just been so busy lately I
>>>> haven't had time to do many reviews. But I should be able to fit in one
>>>> theme a day.
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> From: theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> [theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org] on behalf of Chip Bennett
>>>> [chip at chipbennett.net]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 12:31 PM
>>>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] splitting reviewers between queues
>>>>
>>>> I don't think a paradigm shift is necessary (or helpful) at this point.
>>>>
>>>> The bottom line is: about 10 tickets per day are submitted. Thus, we need
>>>> about 10 tickets per day reviewed and closed, in order to keep up with the
>>>> submission rate. We are approaching 100 people who have reviewed Themes. If
>>>> every person with ticket privileges reviewed two tickets, we would exhaust
>>>> the current queue entirely.
>>>>
>>>> I've tried to push in the past to get reviewers to consider committing to
>>>> a certain minimum level of participation, but as you've noted: it's not
>>>> practical. We ARE all volunteers, and all have extremely busy schedules. (I
>>>> last saw a "40-hour work week" sometime last summer.) Efforts to get such
>>>> commitments inevitably have the opposite effect, as IMX they have only
>>>> driven volunteers AWAY from contributing their time.
>>>>
>>>> That said: I'll do my best to lead by example. I will commit to reviewing
>>>> one Theme per day, every day.
>>>>
>>>> Chip
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Edward Caissie
>>>> <edward.caissie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Although it shouldn't need to be written, but once again it appears a
>>>>> reminder appears to be needed ...
>>>>>
>>>>> To the best of my knowledge, every member of the current Theme Review
>>>>> Team is a volunteer. Every member also has a "full work load" with many
>>>>> simply unable to devote any time to this volunteer activity during that
>>>>> scheduled time. Many of the volunteers have other additional WordPress
>>>>> related activities that add to their typical "40-hour week" work load. We
>>>>> all have lives, too ... so, quite simply, we give what time we can and look
>>>>> to the community to contribute some of their time. Wait times, as noted many
>>>>> times, are inversely proportional to the amount of volunteer reviewers
>>>>> available to do the work.
>>>>>
>>>>> We can appreciate the wait time is long and frustrating. This is not the
>>>>> only time this topic has been discussed, these are not the only ideas that
>>>>> have been considered. Unfortunately until their is perhaps a paradigm shift
>>>>> in regards to the WPTRT we may simply be forced to continue to endure and
>>>>> forge ahead under these conditions.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cais.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Bruce Wampler <weavertheme at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to add my perspective on the review process.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have been submitting one theme - with revisions and slight name
>>>>>> modifications - for almost two years now - starting with 2010 Weaver,
>>>>>> changed to simply Weaver, and now Weaver II.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because Weaver II is a name change, and represents a total rewrite of
>>>>>> Weaver, it has been in the Priority Queue for almost 3 months now. I've just
>>>>>> been sitting here waiting my turn.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But seriously - three months for new themes? The past week, the review
>>>>>> rate has been only one new theme reviewed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is important to keep existing themes up to date - but to essentially
>>>>>> have the new theme approval rate one a week will do nothing to encourage
>>>>>> authors to submit new themes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I had good reasons to change from Weaver to Weaver II, and perhaps
>>>>>> should have requested it be treated as a revision of the existing approved
>>>>>> theme. But I don know if I knew three months ago, that I likely would have
>>>>>> done things differently, including the possibility of simply abandoning the
>>>>>> WP theme repository.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But Weaver II represents a cutting edge theme/framework that has (or
>>>>>> had three months ago) really new features, including what I think is likely
>>>>>> the best mobile support of any WP theme. It is really frustrating to see it
>>>>>> languish in the queue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just think a almost three month wait is excessive, and will seriously
>>>>>> discourage developers from developing and submitting new themes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The discussion of new 3.4 features seems almost silly since if the new
>>>>>> queue theme stays at several months, it is likely that there won't be any
>>>>>> new themes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe is really important to keep fresh, new themes with cutting
>>>>>> edge features coming in for the future health of WordPress.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just some thoughts. I believe something needs to be done. I'd volunteer
>>>>>> to review some themes, but I have serious ethical concerns about that, as
>>>>>> well as a full work load supporting my theme which has become very popular
>>>>>> on its own while waiting on the queue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bruce Wampler
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>
>
>
> --
> cmans
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers



--
My Blog: http://pross.org.uk/
Plugins : http://pross.org.uk/plugins/
Themes: http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/profile/pross
_______________________________________________
theme-reviewers mailing list
theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers




------------------------------

_______________________________________________
theme-reviewers mailing list
theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers


End of theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 20, Issue 60
***********************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120127/fa7777d8/attachment-0001.htm>

More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list