[theme-reviewers] Using WordPress core functions vs. custom functions

Chip Bennett chip at chipbennett.net
Wed Feb 22 21:10:38 UTC 2012


Note also: it is perfectly acceptable to ask the Theme developer to leave
an in-ticket comment, justifying the core-functionality workarounds. Doing
so also facilitates future reviews, and helps alleviate future
questions/frustrations for reviewers AND developers.

Chip

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Caroline Moore <calobee at gmail.com> wrote:

> I can tell from a quick Theme Check and playing with the theme (at your
> suggestion, thanks Cais) that it's more complex from a user
> standpoint--offering background positioning, for example.
>
> Also, the custom header allows users to upload an image of any size/aspect
> ratio (rather than cropping to specific dimensions).  Not necessarily
> "above and beyond," just different.
>
> But again, I think keeping the theme options in one place makes more sense
> than scattering them across the admin UI in this case.  Maybe it's still
> possible to implement the core functionality and have it appear under the
> theme options instead of the Appearance menus, but my knowledge of WP core
> doesn't extend that far yet. :)
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I haven't looked deep into the code, but if you believe the functionality
>> being offered by the theme goes above and beyond the standard
>> implementation recommended to be used in the guidelines then it can be
>> noted but I do not believe it would push the theme over to a "not-approved"
>> resolution ...
>>
>> ... I'll see if I can find some time to look into the code myself as well.
>>
>>
>> Cais.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Caroline Moore <calobee at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm working on the PageLines review.  The theme uses custom functions to
>>> add headers and custom backgrounds (instead of add_custom_image_header or
>>> add_custom_background).
>>>
>>> I'm assuming this is OK since this theme is kind of a special case.  I
>>> can see where, in the interests of keeping all the theme's options in one
>>> place, it makes more sense to use custom functions. It also looks as though
>>> the functionality offered is more complex than the WordPress defaults.
>>>
>>> Let me know if I'm not on the right track with that thinking.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Caro
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Caroline Moore
>
> Calobee Doodles
> Custom design and childrens illustration
> http://www.calobeedoodles.com
> http://calobee.etsy.com
>
> Sixhours Photography
> Conceptual art photography prints
> http://www.sixhours.net
> http://sixhours.etsy.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120222/2c2ce020/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list