[theme-reviewers] Clarifying trac process

[Emil Uzelac]

done!

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Caroline Moore <calobee at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think we're talking about a different theme?  The theme (Hey Cookie)
> only has three versions in the system total so there shouldn't have been
> three middle tickets to close.
>
> It dropped out of Priority #2 when this ticket was closed:
> http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/6355
>
> and the most recent ticket is back in Priority #3:
> http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/6511
>
> But I definitely understand commenting on the oldest ticket to avoid this
> chain-of-tickets nonsense.  I'll do that from now on.  :)
>
>
>
> On Feb 17, 2012, at 9:38 PM, Edward Caissie wrote:
>
> @Caroline - The oldest ticket is still open holding your place in the
> queue. I went in and noted the newest ticket on it ... then closed two of
> the three "middle" tickets yesterday, IIRC.
>
> The standard process, which you followed was to note each new version on
> the older ticket(s). To simplify, just note the newest ticket on the oldest
> ticket when there are multiple tickets that have not been reviewed.
>
> I hope that makes a bit more sense.
>
>
> Cais.
>
> PS: @Emil - No worries (*grin*) EAC.
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Caroline Moore <calobee at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sure, Cais, it's #6355
>>
>> On Feb 17, 2012, at 9:22 PM, Edward Caissie wrote:
>>
>> @Caroline, which tickets are you referring to? I'd like to look into it
>> ...
>>
>>
>> Cais.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I see no harm however what I would do instead is to note the closed
>>> ticket and nicely request that newest Theme should be reviewed when the old
>>> one is closed. When I started little over year ago @Cais was kind enough to
>>> explain this and we're passing that onto newer reviewers.
>>>
>>> Emil
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Caroline Moore <calobee at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Emil, that's what I thought. Am I Ok to reopen the old ticket
>>>> then?
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 17, 2012, at 6:23 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Reviewer needs to review your latest Theme when older version is closed.
>>>> On Feb 17, 2012 4:58 PM, "Caroline Moore" <calobee at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I recently uploaded a new version of one of my not-yet-approved themes
>>>>> and commented on the old ticket with a link to the new version. Another
>>>>> reviewer closed the old ticket before the new one was accepted, so my theme
>>>>> dropped back to the bottom of the review queue.
>>>>>
>>>>> I was under the impression we should wait to mark older tickets as
>>>>> closed-newer-version-uploaded until the latest version of the theme was
>>>>> accepted for review, so themes more or less kept their place in the queue
>>>>> and devs weren't penalized for updating their themes. (This is what I've
>>>>> been doing as a reviewer, at least... maybe I'm wrong?) Can someone clarify?
>>>>>
>>>>> Better yet, is there a formal trac process written somewhere? Is there
>>>>> a need for something like that, with the sudden influx of new reviewers
>>>>> (like myself)?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Caro
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120217/04420681/attachment.htm>