[theme-reviewers] Trac not synching with Extend?

Chip Bennett chip at chipbennett.net
Mon May 23 15:39:41 UTC 2011


I disagree that the current workflow is efficient or feasibly able to be
maintained. This might make a good agenda item for our upcoming meeting.

Chip

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Edward Caissie
<edward.caissie at gmail.com>wrote:

> The current workflow works, as long as it is attended to every day ...
> unfortunately I have been very busy with other projects to keep it within
> the maximum 24 hour turn-around I expected/maintained.
>
> As my plans to day have been completely blown out of the water, I'll go in
> and make sure everything is back in sync (approved, not-approved, etc.)
>
>
> Cais.
>
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>
>> Synching is not only a manual process, it is a rather tedious manual
>> process. Extend has no knowledge of a given ticket's resolution, and we
>> currently have no way in Trac of queueing tickets that require resolution.
>>
>> I have an idea, that we can try. It may or may not work, but it's worth a
>> shot.
>>
>> REVIEWERS: when you close a ticket as APPROVED, add the following keyword
>> to the ticket: "syncapproved". That way, we can add a Trac report around
>> this keyword, and won't have to search for approved Themes that need to be
>> synced. This way, whomever does the sync can just remove the keyword from
>> the ticket.
>>
>> (If you want to be extra helpful, for tickets closed as not-approved or
>> newer-version-uploaded, add this keyword to the ticket: "synchold". But
>> getting the *approved* Themes synced as quickly as possible is far more
>> important than syncing *old* (i.e. not-approved or newer-version-uploaded)
>> tickets.)
>>
>> After having helped with the Trac-Extend sync for a few weeks now, I'm
>> fairly convinced that this method would be more efficient than the current
>> workflow.
>>
>> Chip
>>
>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 5:55 AM, Daniel Tara <contact at onedesigns.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Is there anything wrong with the synch operation?
>>> > Otto, do you know anything about this?
>>>
>>> There is no sync operation, all the themes have to be approved
>>> manually by the mods of the theme system, which is basically Chip,
>>> Pross, Cais, and Emil.
>>>
>>> -Otto
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20110523/aa75df56/attachment.htm>


More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list