[theme-reviewers] Fwd: [WordPress Themes] #3553: THEME: The Common Blog - 1.0

Taryn Wallis taryn at phenomenoodle.com
Tue Apr 26 20:03:29 UTC 2011


Ah, I see. Thanks, Chip!
___________________________________________________________________

*Taryn Wallis*
Phenomenoodle
WordPress website design & development for small businesses with big dreams
www.phenomenoodle.com
+44 1875 34 0044
+44 774 839 8473



On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:

> It's not really a "bug". It is a result of importing the test data. On the
> source site (wpthemetestdata.wordpress.com), the PostID for that post is
> "14". However, the Post ID changes upon import. The solution is to delete
> the post slug, and to let WordPress re-generate it.
>
> I will add this clarification to the list of Codex changes I need to make.
>
> Chip
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Taryn Wallis <taryn at phenomenoodle.com>wrote:
>
>> In one of the themes I reviewed (
>> http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/3553<http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/3553#comment:6>
>> ), I noted that the post with no title wasn't showing up in the blog and
>> gave a 404 error when I tried to access it directly (via the 'view post'
>> link in the Posts screen).
>>
>> The theme author has written the response below detailing a bug he found -
>> has anyone come across this before?
>>
>> Thanks for your help!
>> T
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: WordPress Themes <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> Date: Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:40 PM
>> Subject: Re: [WordPress Themes] #3553: THEME: The Common Blog - 1.0
>> To:
>>
>>
>> #3553: THEME: The Common Blog - 1.0
>> ---------------------------+----------------------------------
>>  Reporter:  plebeian.se   |     Owner:  phenomenoodle
>>      Type:  theme         |    Status:  closed
>> Resolution:  not-approved  |  Keywords:  theme-the-common-blog
>> ---------------------------+----------------------------------
>>
>> Comment (by plebeian.se):
>>
>>  Regarding "(no title) post not displayed and gives 404 error", I switched
>>  to Twentyten and noticed that it had the same error. After some testing I
>>  discovered that if you set your permalink structure to "Month and name",
>>  and you have a low post id, WordPress takes the post id as a date.
>>
>>  Example:
>>  An empty post with id number 14, posted on the 4th march 2011, will get
>>  permalink /2011/03/14/, if you have "Month and name".
>>  This will give a 404 if you have no posts posted on the 14th of march
>>  2011. And it will give an "day archive" for the 14th of march 2011 if you
>>  have any other posts on that specific date.
>>  If you change this to "Day and name" instead the post permalink will be
>>  /2011/03/04/14/ and the post is found.
>>
>>  Ive changed my common settings to "Day and name" and you can see that it
>>  works here:
>>  http://www.plebeian.se/dev/2008/05/04/14/
>>
>>  And like I said, Twentyten has the exact same "bug".
>>
>>  If the post ID is bigger, like 403 or something, this problem doesn't
>>  exist. Basically, I think it's not a problem as long as the post id is
>>  bigger then the number of dates in the specific month of that post. A
>> post
>>  id 31 will work if posted in February. But not in march.
>>
>>
>>  Do I still need to fix this? :)
>>
>> --
>> Ticket URL: <http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/3553#comment:6>
>> WordPress Themes <http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/>
>> WordPress.org Theme Directory Reviews
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20110426/17f6a1ed/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list