[theme-reviewers] BuddyPress Themes

[Edward Caissie]

Great Chris!

Thanks a lot ... is the DeBogger mod something you have done or did Pross_
release it as well?


Cais

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Chris <chris at thematic4you.com> wrote:

>  Hi Cais,
>
>
>
> I will spend some time next weekend to write down some additional criteria
> for reviewing a BuddyPress theme. First thing is still the standard criteria
> for a regular WordPress Theme.
>
>
>
> Most important tool is a mod of ‘DeBogger’ that displays only theme related
> notices.
>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> *Von:* theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org [mailto:
> theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org] *Im Auftrag von *Edward
> Caissie
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 31. August 2010 17:51
>
> *An:* theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> *Betreff:* Re: [theme-reviewers] BuddyPress Themes
>
>
>
> Chris -
>
> It would be great to see your general criteria ( at least how it differs
> from regular theme reviews ) for doing BuddyPress reviews.
>
> It seems most of the team is leery to do a BP Theme, it might help if we
> had more of an idea what special items to keep in mind specifically as you
> seem to have the best handle on them at the moment. This may even make for a
> sub-page specifically for reviewing BuddyPress themes as well.
>
>
> Cais.
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
> wrote:
>
> Chris,
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> The four oldest Themes in the queue now are all BuddyPress Themes. If we
> can take care of the current BuddyPress Themes, the oldest Theme in the
> new/unassigned queue will be 7 days!
>
>
>
> Do you want to take the lead on focusing on on BuddyPress Theme review? If
> so, let me know your username, and we can just assign them to you when we
> come across them in the queue. If not, that's fine, too.
>
>
>
> Chip
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Chris <chris at thematic4you.com> wrote:
>
>   Hi Chip,
>
>
>
> will take care of these themes in the next 2 days.
>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> *Von:* theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org [mailto:
> theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org] *Im Auftrag von *Chip Bennett
> *Gesendet:* Montag, 30. August 2010 15:26
> *An:* theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> *Betreff:* [theme-reviewers] BuddyPress Themes
>
>
>
> Good Morning, Theme Reviewers!
>
>
>
> Just a note: the three oldest, unassigned Themes in the review queue are
> all BuddyPress Themes:
>
>
>
>  Ticket  Summary        Status  Owner Keywords       Created
>
>   #839 <https://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/839>    THEME:
> Russellinka - 1.0.0  new    --        theme-russellinka, buddypress
> 11 days
>
>   #870 <https://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/870>    THEME: Freshbook
> - 1.0      new    --        theme-freshbook, buddypress          8 days
>
> #873 <https://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/873>    THEME: Freshlook -
> 1.0       new    --        theme-freshlook, buddypress           8 days
>
>
>
> Who is handling BuddyPress Theme reviews? If nobody can/will step up to
> focus on them, we may need to hit up the BP folks, and have them recruit
> someone to help us out.
>
>
>
> p.s. *Joseph, Otto, or whomever*: can we get the default column display
> changed for the Open, Unassigned Ticket report? I would recommend: *Ticket,
> Summary, Status, Owner, Keywords, *and *Created* to display by default.
>
>
>
> Chip
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
>
>
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20100901/06f379d5/attachment-0001.htm>