[theme-reviewers] Fwd: THEME: Rachel - 0.8 (closed theme: not-accepted)

// ravi ravi at g8o.net
Sat Jun 26 04:26:45 UTC 2010


Tom can you perhaps explain a bit why you think the background customisation is important? Is it because of the recently added support for it in WP3? I ask because I find this a grey area... Sometimes designers might have a particular look in mind and may not want to change it. I am not a pro designer though and I do this for the fun of it, so this question is more out of curiosity.

I will throw in a license.txt with the standard GnU boilerplate along the line of your template.

Regards,
Ravi


On Jun 25, 2010, at 8:54 PM, Tom Lany <mail at tomlany.net> wrote:

> That (the background image) is fine for now, but it is something that should be worked on.  Regarding your other email, that is okay, but a more detailed description would be preferable.  You could put the code below into your style.css, or add a license.txt with the full license.
> 
> /*  Copyright 2009-2010  YOUR_NAME, EMAIL, ULR, ETC
> 
>    This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>    it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2,
>    as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> 
>    You may NOT assume that you can use any other version of the GPL.
> 
>    This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>    but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>    MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
>    GNU General Public License for more details.
> 
>    You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>    along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
>    Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA  02110-1301  USA
> 
>    The license for this software can also likely be found here:
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html
> */
> 
> 
> Tom Lany
> http://tomlany.net
> 
> On 6/25/10 7:41 PM, // ravi wrote:
>> On Jun 25, 2010, at 5:56 PM, Tom Lany wrote:
>>   
>>> Thanks for fixing these issues.  The theme looks a lot better.  Take a look here: http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/166
>>> 
>>>     
>> Hello again Tom,
>> 
>> thank you for the quick turnaround. I have address most of the issues you have listed:
>> 
>> * the screenshot disappeared because I fat fingered the move of images to the images/ directory ;-).
>> 
>> * the UTF-8 declaration tag is fixed and the JS file has the CDATA encoding now.
>> 
>> * I usually add the “this version has blah-blah…” because it’s the only way to tell the user what’s new in a version *if* they are viewing the theme from within WordPress or wordpress.org. But not a biggie… I have removed it.
>> 
>> * Regarding the customisable background colour and image, that will take a bit of work. I filed a ticket at http://github.com/ahrencode/Rachel-for-WP/issue/1.
>> 
>> If you think the last is a blocking issue, please let me know. If not, I will resubmit the theme once I hear from you.
>> 
>>    —ravi
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> Tom Lany
>>> http://tomlany.net
>>> 
>>> On 6/25/10 4:04 PM, // ravi wrote:
>>>     
>>>> On Jun 22, 2010, at 11:16 PM, Tom Lany wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>       
>>>>> Thanks for the note.  I was the person who reviewed this theme.  If you want to leave the code for the pages file alone, that is probably fine.  I just suggested this as it is what is commonly done in most WordPress themes.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>         
>>>> Hello Tom,
>>>> 
>>>> thanks to you, then, for your detailed review notes. I have fixed (to my knowledge) all the issues identified and posted 0.9 of the theme for review (a minute ago). I did leave the code for the pages file as is, but added a check to the common code to not display date stamp for pages (as suggested in the Codex).
>>>> 
>>>> Additionally I have passed the theme XHTML and CSS through the W3C validator and cleaned it up so the only warnings/errors that remain are the -moz, -webkit shadow and border radius stuff. FYI, since my development blog is not visible outside, I used one of my external blogs (http://0sum.org/). Various other things have been fixed as well: esc_attr() for relevant PHP generated HTML attributes, IE specific CSS, use of register_sidebar_widget() was removed, a few hints for added for the collapsibility of sidebar widgets, meta tags were made single-line, capitalised stylesheet elements were made lowercase, the PHP errors/warnings noted in the Trac ticket were resolved, reference to ‘global $_POST’ was removed, an icon that was not GPL (from pixel-mixer, as you correctly noted) was replaced, 404 page title was set to standard title size.
>>>> 
>>>> I also made sure that the search widget works (please let me know if there is some use case that I am missing). I have not yet created a print style for this theme. That will be significant work, to be done right, and I will work on that shortly.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> 
>>>>    —ravi
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>       
>>>>> Thanks for your submission!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Tom Lany
>>>>> http://tomlany.net
>>>>> 
>>>>>         
>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>> From: // ravi<ravi at g8o.net>
>>>>>> Date: Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:58 PM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: THEME: Rachel - 0.8 (closed theme: not-accepted)
>>>>>> To: Edward Caissie<edward.caissie at gmail.com>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Great feedback, Edward. I will work on fixing the validation etc. Regarding icons, those links were copied over from an older version and I have stripped most icons out of the theme. I will double check and update the links or replace the icons. The one place I disagree is regarding copying code from single.php. I would rather not have duplicated code.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards,  --ravi
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2010, at 10:52 PM, Edward Caissie<edward.caissie at gmail.com>   wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>           
>>>>>>> Please see the details on this ticket in Trac: http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/8
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The WordPress.org Theme Team
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>             
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>           
>>>> 
>>>>       
>>   


More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list