[theme-reviewers] get_template_part()

Edward Caissie edward.caissie at gmail.com
Thu Jul 8 15:43:58 UTC 2010


I believe better than "requiring 3.0 compatibility" is the requirement to
use current functions (deprecation version to be dynamically set) and proper
PHP code.


Cais.

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:

> Good morning, Theme Reviewers!
>
> Another question: when we start requiring 3.0 compatibility, should we
> require
> include() to be replaced by get_template_part(), for including generic
> theme
> template files?
>
> The benefits would be obvious. Would there be any downside to such a
> requirement?
>
> --
> Chip Bennett
> chip at chipbennett.net
> www.chipbennett.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20100708/6c6ebc66/attachment.htm>


More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list