[theme-reviewers] Theme Errors

Chip Bennett chip at chipbennett.net
Mon Dec 13 20:55:15 UTC 2010


Posts Without Titles are about to become a LOT more common, with the advent
of Post Formats. Asides, Links, Status, etc. very conceivably will be
designed not to display a Post Title. We'll need to consider how to handle
such design elements.

Chip

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com>wrote:

> Using the comments link is a possibility but what happens if comments are
> off for the post, too?
>
> Using the date, writing in <no title> and linking to that text, or whatever
> other method is much more consistent. Although all of these ideas are only
> "recommended" at least one should be seriously considered as direct access
> to the post is important.
>
> It might be something to be considered as a requirement in the future, but
> I do not believe posts without titles is a very common item.
>
>
> Cais.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Furcifer <furcifer at furcifer.net> wrote:
>
>> For posts with no title, would the comments link count, instead of i.e.
>> making the date the permalink?
>>
>> *(no title) *
>>
>>    - Post displays properly.
>>    - A link to the singular view of the post is recommended to be
>>    displayed. Making the post date a permalink (see Twenty Ten for an example)
>>    is a great solution.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org [mailto:
>> theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org] *On Behalf Of *Edward
>> Caissie
>> *Sent:* 13 December 2010 20:33
>> *To:* theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [theme-reviewers] Theme Errors
>>
>>
>>
>> I generally only use validation if the theme appears "visually" broken,
>> then the validator can help point out where the issue might be found.
>> Otherwise, as Otto says, take it with a grain of salt.
>>
>>
>> It would be an extremely rare care where I would "not-approve" a theme
>> over a validation issue.
>>
>>
>> Cais.
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Furcifer <furcifer at furcifer.net> wrote:
>>
>> Well in that case I just need to check something with Chip, regarding the
>> comments he left on the previous ticket for this theme, then it should be
>> good to go.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20101213/b3bb814f/attachment.htm>


More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list