[theme-reviewers] Guidelines regarding Theme Names

[Chip Bennett]

That makes perfect sense, as well: existing Themes, with existing users,
shouldn't be changing the Theme Name/install slug.

Chip

2010/8/30 Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com>

> @Fingli - This is a very good point and one requiring additional input ...
> from WPORG. Personally I would "grandfather" it and let it pass as a
> non-issue
>
>
> Cais.
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:17 AM, yulian yordanov <yul.yordanov at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>  What will happen with a theme which is already in repo if they change its
>> name? Would it not be accepted as a new theme rather than a new version? I'm
>> sorry if my question is lame :) but just right now i'm testing one of most
>> popular themes - "Arras Theme" and (obviously) I need to advise the author
>> to change the name.
>>
>> <Fingli>
>>
>>
>> On 30.8.2010 16:55, Chip Bennett wrote:
>>
>> See here:
>> http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review#Theme_Name
>>
>>  Please advise, comment, correct, and/or add appropriate Theme
>> Name-related guidelines. I notice I'm running into several instances where I
>> have to comment on the Theme Name. Some objective guidelines in this area
>> will be helpful.
>>
>>  Chip
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.orghttp://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>> --
>> Юлиян Йорданов
>>
>> Yulian Yordanovhttp://post-scriptum.info/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20100830/566fec51/attachment.htm>