[theme-reviewers] Guidelines regarding Theme Names

[Philip M. Hofer (Frumph)]

that original simplist theme that came up in this theme reviewers thread + comment from otto & nacin

just give it a try with the minimal theme and nacin's plugin, it comes up

(and no, no other deprecated messages come up)

- Phil

The official word is that the 'default' functions that fallback in WP are never really updated and who knows if they're going to be in there anymore in the future.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Edward Caissie 
  To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org 
  Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 7:41 AM
  Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Guidelines regarding Theme Names


  So no comments.php file throws a deprecated message at you? That doesn't seem right ...

  What theme is this happening with? I'd like to see this myself ... and are there other tempalte files we will need to make requirements for similar reasons?


  Cais.


  On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <philip at frumph.net> wrote:

    While your in there add comments.php to the minimal theme files requirement, official deprecated message comes up without it.


      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Chip Bennett 
      To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org 
      Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 7:35 AM
      Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Guidelines regarding Theme Names


      Right on. I threw that together really quickly (and tend to err more toward a "formal" tone anyway. 


      Looks good! Some of those (especially the "version-specific, markup-related terms" item. Could probably use more content there. What else similar don't we want in Theme names?


      Chip


      On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com> wrote:

        I didn't change the intent of the section, but I did go in and "lightened-up" the text a bit ... it's a little less "formal" but the meaning is the same.


        Cais.


        On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:

          See here: 
          http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review#Theme_Name


          Please advise, comment, correct, and/or add appropriate Theme Name-related guidelines. I notice I'm running into several instances where I have to comment on the Theme Name. Some objective guidelines in this area will be helpful.


          Chip


          _______________________________________________
          theme-reviewers mailing list
          theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
          http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers




        _______________________________________________
        theme-reviewers mailing list
        theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
        http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers






--------------------------------------------------------------------------


      _______________________________________________
      theme-reviewers mailing list
      theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
      http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers


    _______________________________________________
    theme-reviewers mailing list
    theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
    http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers






------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  theme-reviewers mailing list
  theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
  http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20100830/e2711305/attachment.htm>