[theme-reviewers] Codex: Theme Review page

[Philip M. Hofer (Frumph)]

Sorry, we're in a group chat right now going over all the cleanup, not theme admin ;/ whoops

@chip if you have ideas for 'just reviewing' child-themes, that'd be great; we can bring your idea's up with ours and hash it all when it comes up.

- Phil
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) 
  To: Chip Bennett 
  Cc: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org 
  Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 2:20 PM
  Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Codex: Theme Review page


  Done done and done, organized, function references added, cleaned up.  We're in the theme admin discussing the changes and stuff right now.

  - Phil
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Chip Bennett 
    To: Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) 
    Cc: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org 
    Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 2:10 PM
    Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Codex: Theme Review page


    Looks great! 


    My only comment regards the by-file listing for functions, tags, and hooks: I had it laid out that way to facilitate stepping through the Theme files during the review: functions.php, header.php, index.php, comments.php, sidebar.php, footer.php.


    If we could organize the list such that it sorts by required/recommended/optional, and still facilitates a single-pass Theme step-through, that would be awesome. I'll take a look (later).


    The next thing on my to-do list was to add Codex links, so I'll try to clean that up, also, when I get the chance.


    Chip


    On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <philip at frumph.net> wrote:

      Cais,

      Revamped the Theme Review codex per our discussion we had earliar.   * Need to verify that I didn't miss any thing.

      http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review#WordPress_Hooks_and_Template_Tags

      Changed:  Version information shows what features were released with required implementation date.

      Changed: Hooks and Template tags to denote a bulk of what is must, should and other optionals instead of separating them by individual files so it would be in a checklist type appearing.

      * Still needs to be updated to fix all the <tt>'s adjusting them where appropriate and implement proper codex links.  I'm not the best with wikicode.

      - Phil

      _______________________________________________
      theme-reviewers mailing list
      theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
      http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers






------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  theme-reviewers mailing list
  theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
  http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20100822/5b5292df/attachment-0001.htm>