[wp-hackers] wp-sidebar.php - In or Out? [was Re:1.3a2 CVS]

[Kitty]

So, Matt, Ryan, & the rest of the team,

It seems like everyone that has an opinion has weighed in, so what's the
word from the devs? In or out?

Either way, let's shoot this horse and move on.

On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 13:53, Kitty wrote:
> After Matt's spamming of the CVS list last night ;) I've been looking
> over some of the changes. One thing that jumps out that could be real
> confusing is footer.php.
> 
> It includes the sidebar/footer/everything not in the main loop. I agree
> that separating the files is good, the sidebar stuff probably shouldn't
> be in a "footer" file. (I would think that most people think of stuff at
> the bottom of the page when they hear "footer," and having the sidebar
> there is misleading.)
> 
> Also with a separate file some of the more elaborate themes could
> include a replacement sidebar file for easy drop in replacement
> 
> I think that under this schema, we should have a sidebar.php in addition
> to footer.php to account for this.
> 
> Pros: More segregation of functions; easier customisation; user changes
> will only bork the sidebar, if something borks; would move towards
> making WP skinable (e.g. have a stylesheet included by the sidebar file,
> etc.).
> 
> Cons: Another file to manage; might increase package size.
> 
> Discussion?
> 
> Attached files:
> sidebar.diff - changes needed to existing files.
> wp-sidebar.php - the new sidebar file.
-- 
Cheers!
Kitty
http://blog.mookitty.co.uk/
http://mookitty.co.uk/devblog/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : /pipermail/hackers_wordpress.org/attachments/20040906/33769002/attachment.bin